ArticleRespiratory research2024
Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children: Delphi study and consensus document about definition and epidemiology, diagnostic work-up, treatment, and follow-up.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) is common in children with asthma but can be present also in children without asthma, especially athletes. Differential diagnosis includes several conditions such as exercise-induced laryngeal obstruction (EILO), cardiac disease, or physical deconditioning. Detailed medical history, clinical examination and specific tests are mandatory to exclude alternative diagnoses. Given the high prevalence of EIB in children and its potential impact on health, sport performance, and daily levels of physical activity, health care professionals should be aware of this condition and able to provide a specific work-up for its identification. The aims of the present study were: (a) to assess the agreement among hospital pediatricians and primary care pediatricians of Emilia-Romagna Region (Italy) about the management of EIB in children and (b) formulate statements in a consensus document to help clinicians in daily clinical practice.
methodsAccording to Delphi method, a panel of specialists scored 40 statements that were then revised and discussed during online meetings to reach full consensus. Statements were then formulated.
resultsTo obtain full consensus, the questionnaire was administered in two rounds after full discussion of the uncertain topics on the basis of the latest evidence on EIB published over the last 10 years. Despite an overall agreement on EIB management, some gaps emerged in the sections dedicated to diagnosis and treatment. Nine summary statements on definition, pathogenesis, diagnostic work-up, treatment, and follow-up were eventually formulated.
conclusionsThis study describes the knowledge of EIB in a group of pediatricians and highlights gaps and uncertainties in diagnosis and treatment. The creation of statements shared by the specialists of the same area may improve the management of EIB in children. However, more research and evidence are needed to better clarify the best treatment and to standardize the best diagnostic protocol limiting useless examinations but at the same time assuring the best management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.