ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2024
Non-adherence to antenatal iron supplementation and its determinants among pregnant women in 35 sub-saharan African countries: a generalized linear mixed-effects modeling with robust Poisson regression analysis.
Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Impact of Adherence to Prenatal Multiple Micronutrient Supplements on Gestational Weight Gain in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Simulation Study.Current developments in nutrition · 2026Article
- Maternal health literacy and its associated factors among pregnant women in Western Cape antenatal clinics.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2026Article
- Prevalence, risk factors, and birth outcomes of anaemia in pregnancy across Tanzania: A scoping review.Journal of public health research · 2026Review
- Association analysis of obesity and hypertension and research on ethnic heterogeneity: a cross-sectional study based on different populations in Northwest China.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Urban-Rural Disparities in Non-Adherence to Iron Supplementation Among Pregnant Women Aged 15 to 49 in Sub-Saharan Africa.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundDespite the integration of iron supplementation into routine antenatal care programs as a nutritional intervention to prevent anemia in pregnant women, the use of this supplement for the recommended duration remains low in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). Evidence on maternal compliance with iron supplementation at the SSA level is lacking and most of the previous studies have been limited to specific geographic areas. Therefore, the current study used large population survey data from 35 SSA countries to estimate the pooled prevalence of non-adherence and its determinants.
methodsA secondary analysis was conducted using data from the demographic and health surveys across 35 SSA countries. After excluding women with missing data on the outcome variable, a weighted sample of 158,941 women who received iron supplementation during their recent pregnancy was included in the analysis. Forest plot was used to present the pooled and country-level rates of non-adherence to antenatal iron supplementation. A multilevel mixed-effects Poisson regression with robust variance was done to identify determinants of non-adherence.
resultsThe pooled prevalence of non-compliance to iron supplementation in SSA was 65.1% [95% CI: 64.9 - 65.3%], with the lowest level in Zambia (18%) and the highest in Burundi (97%). The analysis revealed that living in rural areas (aPR: 1.16, 95% CI: 1.13-1.19), lack of access to mass media (aPR: 1.10, 95% CI: 1.09-1.12), low household wealth (aPR: 1.11, 95% CI: 1.09-1.14), late (aPR: 1.19, 95% CI: 1.17-1.20) and frequent ANC visit (aPR: 1.28, 95% CI: 1.26, 1.29), women's employment status (aPR: 1.05, 95% CI: 1.03-1.06), husband illiteracy (aPR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.10-1.13), and distance to a health facilities (aPR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.01-1.05) were associated higher prevalence of non-adherence. Conversely, older maternal age was associated lower prevalence of non-compliance (aPR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.94-0.97).
conclusionMore than six out of ten pregnant women in SSA do not take iron supplements for the recommended period, with substantial variations across the countries. The level of non-adherence was significantly varied by women's sociodemographic and reproductive characteristics. This urges the need for strengthening community health interventions and other existing programs to reach women in rural and economically disadvantaged settings. Furthermore, promoting antenatal care services through mass media and community-based health education strategies is key for scaling up the utilization of the supplement. Our results also suggest the importance of establishing the community-based distribution of iron supplements to address women with limited access to the healthcare system.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.