Evidence mapPaperPMID 39732885Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Genome-wide analysis of alternative splicing differences in hepatic ischemia reperfusion injury.

Yongliang Hua, Xinglong Li, Bing Yin, Shounan Lu, Baolin Qian, Yongzhi Zhou, Zhongyu Li, Zhanzhi Meng, Yong Ma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Yongliang HuaDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Xinglong LiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Bing YinDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Shounan LuDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Baolin QianDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yongzhi ZhouDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Zhongyu LiDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Zhanzhi MengDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China.
Yong MaDepartment of Minimally Invasive Hepatic Surgery, Key Laboratory of Hepatosplenic Surgery, the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Ministry of Education, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China. mayong@ems.hrbmu.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-6508-508X

Funding

Heilongjiang Postdoctoral Foundation LBH-Z11066Natural Science Foundation of Heilongjiang Province of China LC2018037the National Scientific Foundation of China 81100305, 81470876, 81270527 and 82370643the Scientific Foundation of the First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University 2019L01, HYD2020JQ0007
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative splicing (AS) contributes to transcript and protein diversity, affecting their structure and function. However, the specific transcriptional regulatory mechanisms underlying AS in the context of hepatic ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury in mice have not been extensively characterized. In this study, we investigated differentially alternatively spliced (DAS) genes and differentially expressed transcripts (DETs) in a mouse model of hepatic IR injury using the high throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis and replicate multivariate analysis of transcript splicing (rMATS) analysis. We further conducted Gene ontology (GO) term enrichment, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database and the protein-protein interaction (PPI) network. A total of 898 DAS genes (p ≤ 0.05) were screened out in the hepatic IR group compared to the sham group, while functional enrichment analysis revealed that DETs and DAS genes were significantly associated with the ATP-dependent chromain, splicesome and metabolic pathways. The expression level of the DAS genes: Gabpb2, Smg1, Tnrc6c, Mettl17, Smpd4, Kcnt2, D16Ertd472e, Rab3gap2, Echdc2 and Ssx2ip were verified by RT-PCR and qRT-PCR. Our findings provide a comprehensive genome-wide view of AS events in hepatic IR injury in mice, enhancing our understanding of AS dynamics and the molecular mechanisms governing alternative pre-mRNA splicing.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingLiverReperfusion InjuryAnimalsGene Expression ProfilingGene OntologyGenome-Wide Association StudyMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLProtein Interaction Maps

Identifiers

PMID39732885
PMCPMC11682299

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.