ArticleScientific reports2024
Preliminary study of Kinesio Taping in rectus abdominis diastasis treatment and abdominal circumference improvement in postpartum women: a retrospective study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Rectus abdominis diastasis (RAD) is a key factor in the rehabilitation of postpartum women. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of Kinesio Taping (KT) in RAD treatment and abdominal changes. The medical records of women with RAD who received KT treatment at the hospital were reviewed. A total of 138 women were included and their demographic characteristics were reviewed, including data before and after RAD treatment, abdominal circumference at the umbilicus and both above and below the umbilicus, as well as the distance from the xiphoid to the umbilicus, distance from the umbilicus to the pubic symphysis. The width of RAD decreased from 4.58 ± 1.74 cm to 2.33 ± 0.90 cm after KT treatment (t = P < 0.001) compared to before treatment. After treatment, the proportions of women with normal, mild, moderate, and severe RAD were 28.1%, 44.6%, 26.6%, and 0.7%, respectively, showing statistical significance (P < 0.001). A statistically significant difference was observed in the abdominal circumference reduction at the umbilicus and above and below the umbilicus before and after KT treatment. However, no statistically significant difference was noted in terms of the changes in the distance from the umbilicus to the pubic symphysis. A statistically significant difference was observed before treatment in abdominal circumference below the umbilicus between the cured and non-cured groups. Preliminary analysis results showed a positive effect of Kinesio Taping treatment in promoting rectus abdominis diastasis recovery and improving abdominal circumference. Furthermore, rectus abdominis diastasis was positively correlated with lower abdominal circumference and anterior abdominal injury.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.