ArticleScientific reports2024
Enhance fashion classification of mosquito vector species via self-supervised vision transformer.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review of Anopheles abundance and meta-analysis of nonhuman primate malaria infection in mosquitoes in Thailand.Parasites & vectors · 2026Pooled it
- Intelligent identification of medical and veterinary intracellular protozoa by using self-supervised learning.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Lung Ultrasound for Pneumothorax: Diagnostic Accuracy Compared with CT in Emergency and Critical Care.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2025Article
- Taxonomic signal in the wing cells ofJournal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025Article
- Accurate identification of medically importantCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vector-borne diseases pose a major worldwide health concern, impacting more than 1 billion people globally. Among various blood-feeding arthropods, mosquitoes stand out as the primary carriers of diseases significant in both medical and veterinary fields. Hence, comprehending their distinct role fulfilled by different mosquito types is crucial for efficiently addressing and enhancing control measures against mosquito-transmitted diseases. The conventional method for identifying mosquito species is laborious and requires significant effort to learn. Classification is subsequently carried out by skilled laboratory personnel, rendering the process inherently time-intensive and restricting the task to entomology specialists. Therefore, integrating artificial intelligence with standard taxonomy, such as molecular techniques, is essential for accurate mosquito species identification. Advancement in novel tools with artificial intelligence has challenged the task of developing an automated system for sample collection and identification. This study aims to introduce a self-supervised Vision Transformer supporting an automatic model for classifying mosquitoes found across various regions of Thailand. The objective is to utilize self-distillation with unlabeled data (DINOv2) to develop models on a mobile phone-captured dataset containing 16 species of female mosquitoes, including those known for transmitting malaria and dengue. The DINOv2 model surpassed the ViT baseline model in precision and recall for all mosquito species. When compared on a species-specific level, utilizing the DINOv2 model resulted in reductions in false negatives and false positives, along with enhancements in precision and recall values, in contrast to the baseline model, across all mosquito species. Notably, at least 10 classes exhibited outstanding performance, achieving above precision and recall rates exceeding 90%. Remarkably, when applying cropping techniques to the dataset instead of utilizing the original photographs, there was a significant improvement in performance across all DINOv2 models studied. This is demonstrated by an increase in recall to 87.86%, precision to 91.71%, F1 score to 88.71%, and accuracy to 98.45%, respectively. Malaria mosquito species can be easily distinguished from another genus like Aedes, Mansonia, Armigeres, and Culex, respectively. While classifying malaria vector species presented challenges for the DINOv2 model, utilizing the cropped images enhanced precision by up to 96% for identifying one of the top three malaria vectors in Thailand, Anopheles minimus. A proficiently trained DINOv2 model, coupled with effective data management, can contribute to the development of a mobile phone application. Furthermore, this method shows promise in supporting field professionals who are not entomology experts in effectively addressing pathogens responsible for diseases transmitted by female mosquitoes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.