SynthesisJournal of nanobiotechnology2024
Nanoparticle and microparticle-based systems for enhanced oral insulin delivery: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Analytical Validation of an HPLC-DAD Method for Ivermectin Quantification in Polymeric Nanocapsules.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Plant- and Microalgae-Based Biotechnological Strategies for Affordable and Non-Invasive Delivery of Antidiabetic Peptides.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Targeted Nanodelivery of WGX50 and Curcumin via Gold Nanoparticles for Alzheimer's Therapy.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2026Article
- Efficient Oral Insulin Delivery Through Thiolated Trimethyl Chitosan-Grafted β-Cyclodextrin Nanoparticles.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery Systems: Current Advances and Future Directions.Current drug targets · 2026Review
- Engineered GLP-1R-targeting nanoplatforms: multimodal therapeutics in human diseases.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus (DM) prevalence is rising worldwide. Current therapies comprising subcutaneous insulin injections can cause adverse effects such as lipodystrophy, local reactions like redness and swelling, fluid retention, and allergic reactions. Nanoparticle carriers for oral insulin are groundbreaking compared to existing methods because they are non-invasive treatments, showing operational convenience, controlled release profile, and ability to simulate the physiological delivery route into the bloodstream. These systems improve patient adherence and have demonstrated the potential to lower blood glucose levels in DM. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis aimed at compiling relevant data to pave the way for developing innovative nano- and microparticles for the oral delivery of insulin. Our analysis of 85 articles revealed that the diminution of glucose levels is not proportional to the administered insulin dosage, which ranged from 1 to 120 International Units (IU). The meta-analysis data indicated that 25 IU of encapsulated porcine insulin did not produce a statistically significant outcome (p = 0.93). In contrast, a dosage of 30 IU was efficacious in eliciting an optimal hypoglycemic effect compared to excipient controls. Parameters such as a high degree of encapsulation (~ 90%), particle size (200-400 nm), and polydispersity index (0.086-0.3) are all associated with lower blood glucose levels. These parameters were also significant in the linear regression analysis. Among the excipients employed, chitosan emerged as a prevalent excipient in formulations due to its biocompatible and biodegradable properties and its ability to establish stable polymeric matrices. Even though oral insulin administration is a promising therapeutic method, it cannot guarantee preclinical safety and therapeutic efficacy yet in regulating glucose levels in diabetic conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.