Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734394›Full record

ArticleVaccine: X2025

Innate immune response after BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination associates with reactogenicity.

Catharina E van Ewijk, Sara Suárez Hernández, Ronald H J Jacobi, Mirjam J Knol, Susan J M Hahné, Alienke J Wijmenga-Monsuur, Mardi C Boer, Martijn D B van de Garde

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine: X, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catharina E van EwijkCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Sara Suárez HernándezCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Ronald H J JacobiCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Mirjam J KnolCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Susan J M HahnéCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Alienke J Wijmenga-MonsuurCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Mardi C BoerCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.
Martijn D B van de GardeCentre for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, the Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The innate immune response is important for the development of the specific adaptive immunity, however it may also be associated with reactogenicity after vaccination. We explore the association between innate responsiveness, reactogenicity, and antibody response after first COVID-19 vaccination. Methods: We included 146 healthy Dutch individuals aged 12-59 who received their first BNT162b2 (Comirnaty, Pfizer) COVID-19 vaccination. Data on reactogenicity were collected for each individual through daily questionnaires from day 0-5 after vaccination. From 60 participants, serum (adults) and plasma (adolescents) samples were collected before and/or 2 ± 1 days after vaccination to measure cytokines/chemokines as markers for innate responsiveness. Each individual was categorised into innate low, intermediate and high responder based on above or below the median value for each analyte detected after vaccination. For 137 participants, serum was collected at day 28 after vaccination for Spike S1- and RBD-antibody concentration. The associations between reactogenicity and/or innate responsiveness and/or log-transformed antibody concentration were explored using logistic and linear regressions. Results: Most participants (85 %) reported both local and systemic symptoms after vaccination. Two participants reported no symptoms. More than half (54 %) reported one or more moderate symptoms. Significantly higher levels of pro-inflammatory mediators CXCL9, CXCL10, CXCL11, IFNγ and CCL20 in adults, and CXCL9, CXCL10 and CXCL11 in adolescents, were found after vaccination. Participants who showed high innate immune responsiveness had higher odds (OR 6.0; 95 % CI 1.4-33) of experiencing one or more moderate symptoms. No association was found between innate responsiveness or having one or more moderate symptoms with Spike S1- or RBD-antibody concentration at day 28 after vaccination. Conclusion: Our results suggest an association between the strength of the innate immune response and the severity of reactogenicity to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. However, more research is needed to understand the relation between reactogenicity and immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccines.

Indexed as

Adverse eventsImmunogenicityInnate immunitySARS-CoV-2Side effects

Identifiers

PMID39734394
PMCPMC11681879

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.