Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39734447›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastrointestinal surgery2024

Does lymph node dissection improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer?

Liang Wang, Shan-Shan Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastrointestinal surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Liang WangDepartment of Gastrointestinal Oncology Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China. wangliang19911128@163.com.
Shan-Shan LiuGraduate School of Qinghai University, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining 810000, Qinghai Province, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The number of lymph nodes (LNs) dissected during surgery has become an interesting topic. Simple intuition always leads us to believe that dissecting more LNs will result in more accurate pathological staging and assurance of surgical quality. However, when the number of LNs dissected reaches a certain threshold, the patient's prognosis does not continue to improve as the number of dissected nodes increases. Instead, an increase in the number of dissected LNs may be accompanied by a higher incidence of complications. Currently, there are only less than 40% of colorectal cancer patients undergoing adequate LN evaluation. Therefore, obtaining a sufficient number of LNs in clinical practice is extremely challenging. How to further address the insufficiency of LN dissection due to various reasons, which results in concerns of surgeons about patient prognosis, is currently a critical focus.

Indexed as

Colorectal cancerNumber of lymph nodesOverall survivalT stageTumor node metastasis

Identifiers

PMID39734447
PMCPMC11650252

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.