ArticleCureus2024
The Application of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy in Treating Pulmonary Fibrosis: A Scoping Review.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-term monthly mesenchymal stromal cell therapy for advanced chronic lung allograft dysfunction: a single-centre safety and feasibility cohort study.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stromal cell-derived extracellular vesicles alleviate radiation induced pulmonary fibrosis.World journal of stem cells · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pulmonary fibrosis (PF) is a medical condition that affects the lungs and causes scarring due to the deposition of excess fibrotic tissue. This is often preceded by various causes and can lead to long-term health consequences. The treatment of PF using mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to correct lung damage and decrease inflammation is a current focus of research. MSCs are beneficial in inhibiting the immune response and inducing more efficient repair processes, therefore having the potential to be useful in various settings. This review aims to identify the current utilization of MSCs in treating PF in adults. A systematic search was conducted according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Reviewers Manual using Ovid Medline, Embase, and Web of Science to identify studies. Following PRISMA guidelines, eligible peer-reviewed studies that used MSCs to treat adults with PF were identified. The initial search produced 1,836 articles after removing duplicates. Twenty-nine articles met the inclusion criteria. A final analysis of the articles further narrowed the number to eight articles that met all criteria and were relevant to the scoping review's objective. Four studies utilized bone marrow-derived MSCs, two utilized umbilical-derived MSCs, one utilized placenta-derived MSCs, and one utilized adipose-derived MSCs. Of these studies, five administered treatments via an intravenous infusion, two used an endobronchial infusion, and the last utilized an intratracheal approach. The use of MSCs in the treatment of PF in adults was found to be safe with the most common adverse effect reported being fever and chills which resolved a few hours after administration. Although the research regarding MSC use in the treatment of idiopathic PF is relatively new, our results summarize the current sources, route of administration, and current adverse effects. We have shown that future studies with larger sample sizes should be performed to determine long-term outcomes and overall efficacy before clinical practice guidelines become implemented.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.