ArticleTelemedicine reports2024
Identifying Factors Contributing to Dropouts in a Pilot Telenutrition Weight-Loss Program: A Qualitative Study.
Article in Telemedicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Telehealth programs exhibit strong potential to improve health measures and quality of life among obese and overweight individuals for whom medical nutritional therapy remains a challenge due to poor adherence and dietary compliance. Supporting weight-management programs with dietary interventions or "telenutrition" and integrating telemonitoring and/or telehealth coaching have had a significant positive impact on weight-loss patients achieving their goals in long-term interventions. Methods: The aim of the current study was to identify the factors leading patients to drop out of a telenutrition weight-loss program, including weekly telemonitoring (total of 36 weeks) and monthly telehealth coaching (total of 6 months). Descriptive qualitative semistructured interviews were held with 10 obese and overweight participants. The data gathered through these interviews were then thematically analyzed through a content analysis. Results: The findings showed that 50% of participants who dropped out of the study felt pressured at work and/or university. Specifically, 60% reported being influenced by marital responsibilities, and 50% indicated that they did not achieve their goals. Nevertheless, participants who dropped out of the study reported that they were not negatively influenced by family factors and/or financial status. Participants also indicated feeling happy to take part in the program and noted that the diet positively influenced their psychological status. Participants also noted the clarity of instructions and that they were fully motivated during the trial. Conclusions: The factors associated with dropouts in this study were different from those identified in the literature, given that our weight-loss program was delivered remotely and supported with weekly telemonitoring and monthly telehealth coaching. Despite the dropouts, the interview data highlighted positive factors that could enhance adherence to the dietary program and reduce dropout rates in larger and longer interventions. Future research should highlight the need to develop clear guidelines related to telenutrition programs or other digital health interventions to ensure successful long-term positive outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.