ArticleBriefings in functional genomics2025
STLBRF: an improved random forest algorithm based on standardized-threshold for feature screening of gene expression data.
Article in Briefings in functional genomics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Hybrid tuned deep learning model for breast cancer diagnosis using genetic data.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multi-omics mapping of PSC genetic risk to a high TWAS-active JAML+ lipid-associated macrophage program: bridging single-cell heterogeneity, spatial fibrotic niches, and machine learning selection.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Article
- Deciphering the Regulatory Networks of the Migrasome-Associated Cell Subpopulation in Heterotopic Ossification via Multi-Omics Analysis.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When the traditional random forest (RF) algorithm is used to select feature elements in biostatistical data, a large amount of noise data and parameters can affect the importance of the selected feature elements, making the control of feature selection difficult. Therefore, it is a challenge for the traditional RF algorithm to preserve the accuracy of algorithm results in the presence of noise data. Generally, directly removing noise data can result in significant bias in the results. In this study, we develop a new algorithm, standardized threshold, and loops based random forest (STLBRF), and apply it to the field of gene expression data for feature gene selection. This algorithm, based on the traditional RF algorithm, combines backward elimination and K-fold cross-validation to construct a cyclic system and set a standardized threshold: error increment. The algorithm overcomes the shortcomings of existing gene selection methods. We compare ridge regression, lasso regression, elastic net regression, the traditional RF algorithm, and our improved RF algorithm using three real gene expression datasets and conducting a quantitative analysis. To ensure the reliability of the results, we validate the effectiveness of the genes selected by these methods using the Random Forest classifier. The results indicate that, compared to other methods, the STLBRF algorithm achieves not only higher effectiveness in feature gene selection but also better control over the number of selected genes. Our method offers reliable technical support for feature expression analysis and research on biomarker selection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.