Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736175›Full record

SynthesisEnvironment international2025

Private, public, and bottled drinking water: Shared contaminant-mixture exposures and effects challenge.

Paul M Bradley, Kristin M Romanok, Kelly L Smalling, Stephanie E Gordon, Bradley J Huffman, Katie Paul Friedman, Daniel L Villeneuve, Brett R Blackwell, Suzanne C Fitzpatrick, Michael J Focazio and 5 more

Abstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Environment international, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Paul M BradleyU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, SC, USA. Electronic address: pbradley@usgs.gov.
Kristin M RomanokU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Kelly L SmallingU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.
Stephanie E GordonU.S. Geological Survey, Kearneysville, WV, USA.
Bradley J HuffmanU.S. Geological Survey, Columbia, SC, USA.
Katie Paul FriedmanU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Daniel L VilleneuveU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, USA.
Brett R BlackwellU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, USA.
Suzanne C FitzpatrickU.S. Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Michael J FocazioU.S. Geological Survey, Reston, VA, USA.
Elizabeth Medlock-KakaleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Durham, NC, USA.
Shannon M MeppelinkU.S. Geological Survey, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Ana Navas-AcienDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Anne E NigraDepartment of Environmental Health Sciences, Columbia University, New York, NY, USA.
Molly L SchreinerU.S. Geological Survey, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumans are primary drivers of environmental-contaminant exposures worldwide, including in drinking-water (DW). In the United States, point-of-use DW (POU-DW) is supplied via private tapwater (TW), public-supply TW, and bottled water (BW). Differences in management, monitoring, and messaging and lack of directly-intercomparable exposure data influence the actual and perceived quality and safety of different DW supplies and directly impact consumer decision-making.

objectivesThe purpose of this paper is to provide a meta-analysis (quantitative synthesis) of POU-DW contaminant-mixture exposures and corresponding potential human-health effects of private-TW, public-TW, and BW by aggregating exposure results and harmonizing apical-health-benchmark-weighted and bioactivity-weighted effects predictions across previous studies by this research group. DISCUSSION: Simultaneous exposures to multiple inorganic and organic contaminants of known or suspected human-health concern are common across all three DW supplies, with substantial variability observed in each and no systematic difference in predicted cumulative risk between supplies. Differences in contaminant or contaminant-class exposures, with important implications for DW-quality improvements, were observed and attributed to corresponding differences in regulation and compliance monitoring.

conclusionThe results indicate that human-health risks from contaminant exposures are common to and comparable in all three DW-supplies, including BW. Importantly, this study's target analytical coverage, which exceeds that currently feasible for water purveyors or homeowners, nevertheless is a substantial underestimation of the breadth of contaminant mixtures in the environment and potentially present in DW. Thus, the results emphasize the need for improved understanding of the adverse human-health implications of long-term exposures to low-level inorganic-/organic-contaminant mixtures across all three distribution pipelines and do not support commercial messaging of BW as a systematically safer alternative to public-TW. Regardless of the supply, increased public engagement in source-water protection and drinking-water treatment is necessary to reduce risks associated with long-term DW-contaminant exposures, especially in vulnerable populations, and to reduce environmental waste and plastics contamination.

Indexed as

Drinking WaterEnvironmental ExposureWater Pollutants, ChemicalWater SupplyHumansUnited StatesDrinking WaterWater Pollutants, ChemicalBottled waterContaminant mixturesDrinking waterInorganicsOrganicsPoint of usePrivate supplyPublic supply

Identifiers

PMID39736175
PMCPMC12086739

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.