ArticleBMC neurology2024
Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome in a methylphenidate-treated patient: a case report.
Article in BMC neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome-related headache and delayed cerebral infarction: a mini review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundReversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome (RCVS) is characterized by severe headaches, often thunderclap headaches, and a multifocal constriction of the cerebral arteries. Although RCVS can occur spontaneously, some cases occur after exposure to drugs. We describe the first case of RCVS in which methylphenidate, a drug with vasoconstrictive properties, is the only suspected drug. Still an unexpected adverse drug reaction of methylphenidate, and so far observed with the concomitant use of vasoactive drugs and methylphenidate, RCVS can be observed when methylphenidate is used alone. CASE PRESENTATION: A 44-year-old French female presented with sudden onset of severe thunderclap headache during exercise. She had been treated for about 2 years with 54 mg extended-release MPH twice a week for attention deficit / hyperactivity disorder. After clinical, biological and imaging examinations, clinicians concluded to a highly probable RCVS diagnosis, probably linked to methylphenidate use. Major causes of RCVS were ruled out and the methylphenidate treatment was discontinued. The outcome was favourable with nimodipine treatment. We also describe two other cases of methylphenidate induced RCVS recorded in French Pharmacovigilance Database. Moreover, RCVS is an adverse reaction reported more frequently than expected with methylphenidate in the International Pharmacovigilance Database (VigiBase®), suggesting a pharmacovigilance signal. Given its pharmacodynamics, i.e. pre-synaptic dopamine and norepinephrine reuptake inhibition, methylphenidate is theoretically likely to contribute to this vascular event.
conclusionsThe role of methylphenidate needs to be considered in case of RCVS diagnosis observed in a treated patient. Although the frequency of this potential adverse drug reaction is expected to be rare, clinicians should be aware of its possible occurrence, given the ever-increasing use of methylphenidate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.