SynthesisSystematic reviews2024
An updated network meta-analysis of non-pharmacological interventions for primary hypertension in adults: insights from recent studies.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Effects of different exercise modalities on blood pressure and endothelial function in prehypertension individuals: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- An RCT META analysis based on the efficacy of Tai Chi exercise therapy on blood pressure and blood lipids in patients with essential hypertension.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Pooled it
- Effect of a physical activity promotion intervention based on the transtheoretical model on blood pressure in patients with hypertension attending primary care: a randomized controlled trial.BMC primary care · 2026Trial
- Assessing the risk of bias of clinical trials with large language models and ROBUST-RCT: a feasibility study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Quantity-effect correlation between water intake and serum uric acid in US adults: a cross-sectional study based on NHANES data.Translational andrology and urology · 2025Article
- Review
- Pathophysiology of Prediabetes Hyperinsulinemia and Insulin Resistance in the Cardiovascular System.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- The Existing Interventions to Promote Self-Care and Self-Monitoring Preventing Hypertension Among Thai Risk People: A Scoping Review.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPrimary hypertension significantly impacts global cardiovascular health, contributing to increased mortality rates and posing a substantial public health challenge. Recognizing the growing evidence supporting non-pharmacological interventions (NPIs) for controlling primary hypertension, our study employs Network Meta-Analysis (NMA) to comprehensively assess their efficacy.
methodsThis review updates a prior systematic review by searching for original literature on NPIs for primary hypertension from 2013 to 2024. We conducted a thorough search in eight databases, including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, CNKI, WanFang Data, and Chongqing VIP, identifying potential randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from January 1, 2013, to August 1, 2024. Primary outcomes included the mean changes in blood pressure before and after treatment. Analysis was performed using GeMTC package (R 4.2.3), and Stata 17.0. The confidence of evidence was examined using Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA).
resultsUtilizing NMA, we reviewed 9,189 studies, identifying 54 eligible articles with 5,827 participants. Investigating 22 distinct NPIs, the focus was on changes in systolic and diastolic blood pressure pre and post-treatment. Lifestyle intervention + Tai Chi significantly reduced systolic (-21.75 mm Hg; 95% CI -33.25 to -10.02) and diastolic blood pressure (-13.62 mm Hg; 95% CI -23.14 to -3.71) compared to usual care and other NPIs. Consistency and regression analyses did not reveal significant differences.
conclusionThis review provides a comprehensive evaluation of NPIs for primary hypertension, emphasizing lifestyle + Tai Chi as a preferred NPI. Breathing exercises show potential in lowering systolic blood pressure, and acupuncture + tui na demonstrates effectiveness in reducing diastolic blood pressure, outperforming other interventions. The study reinforces the role of NPIs in managing primary hypertension, providing a foundation for future hypertension research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.