ArticleRespiratory research2024
Trends in initial pharmacological COPD treatment in primary care (2010-2021): a population-based study using the PHARMO Data Network.
Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Correction: Trends in initial pharmacological COPD treatment in primary care (2010-2021): a population-based study using the PHARMO Data Network.Respiratory research · 2025Article
- Research Trends in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (2005-2024): From Drug Therapy to Comprehensive Rehabilitation Strategies.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
- Adherence to Inhaled Medication Guidelines in Patients with COPD: Evaluating the GOLD 2023 Strategy in a Real-World Secondary Care Setting.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPharmacological treatment is a cornerstone of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, with general practitioners providing the most care. However, the lack of data on prescribing trends in initial pharmacotherapy in primary care hinders the understanding of how scientific and technical developments impact patient care and may also perpetuate suboptimal practices. Hence, this study aims to analyze trends in the initial pharmacological treatment of newly diagnosed COPD patients in Dutch primary care from 2010 to 2021.
methodsA repeated cross-sectional study was conducted via the PHARMO GP Database. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of individuals managed by general practitioners in the Netherlands within the PHARMO Data Network. Individuals aged ≥ 40 years at diagnosis with an International Classification of Primary Care code for COPD (R95) were included. Initial pharmacological treatment was identified based on the first prescription issued within 90 days postdiagnosis. The annual proportions of individuals receiving a specific treatment among those diagnosed were calculated and directly standardized by age and sex according to the 2021 Dutch population structure. Trend analysis was performed via joinpoint regression.
resultsA total of 54,628 COPD patients were included (median [IQR] age: 65 [57-73]; 53.7% male), with 36.4% not receiving respiratory medication within 90 days of diagnosis, and 4.2% on other treatments. Trend analysis revealed that LAMA monotherapy increased from 13.4% in 2010 to 15.1% in 2015 and then declined to 11.0% by 2021. Moreover, LABA-ICS decreased from 17.6% to 8.5% between 2010 and 2018, after which it plateaued. In contrast, LABA-LAMA sharply increased, from 0.6% in 2010 to 9.6% in 2021. LABA monotherapy increased from 2.6% in 2010 to 5.7% in 2021. Triple therapy has remained constant. For reliever-only therapies, SABA increased from 8.5% in 2010 to 14.3% in 2018 and then stabilized, whereas SAMA and SABA-SAMA remained low throughout.
conclusionsShifts in initial pharmacological COPD treatment from 2010 to 2021 likely reflect the introduction of new inhalers and updated management strategies. However, a significant proportion of patients remain without GP prescriptions, which warrants further investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.