Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39736696›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2024

Trends in initial pharmacological COPD treatment in primary care (2010-2021): a population-based study using the PHARMO Data Network.

Guilherme Rodrigues, Joana Antão, Qichen Deng, Brenda N Baak, Alda Marques, Frits M E Franssen, Martijn A Spruit

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Guilherme RodriguesLab3R, Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Edifício 30, Agras do Crasto, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal. guilherme.rodrigues@ua.pt.
Joana AntãoLab3R, Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Edifício 30, Agras do Crasto, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Qichen DengDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, The Netherlands.
Brenda N BaakPHARMO Institute for Drug Outcomes Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Alda MarquesLab3R, Respiratory Research and Rehabilitation Laboratory, School of Health Sciences, University of Aveiro (ESSUA), Edifício 30, Agras do Crasto, Campus Universitário de Santiago, 3810-193, Aveiro, Portugal.
Frits M E FranssenDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, The Netherlands.
Martijn A SpruitDepartment of Research and Development, Ciro, Horn, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPharmacological treatment is a cornerstone of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) management, with general practitioners providing the most care. However, the lack of data on prescribing trends in initial pharmacotherapy in primary care hinders the understanding of how scientific and technical developments impact patient care and may also perpetuate suboptimal practices. Hence, this study aims to analyze trends in the initial pharmacological treatment of newly diagnosed COPD patients in Dutch primary care from 2010 to 2021.

methodsA repeated cross-sectional study was conducted via the PHARMO GP Database. Data were extracted from the electronic health records of individuals managed by general practitioners in the Netherlands within the PHARMO Data Network. Individuals aged ≥ 40 years at diagnosis with an International Classification of Primary Care code for COPD (R95) were included. Initial pharmacological treatment was identified based on the first prescription issued within 90 days postdiagnosis. The annual proportions of individuals receiving a specific treatment among those diagnosed were calculated and directly standardized by age and sex according to the 2021 Dutch population structure. Trend analysis was performed via joinpoint regression.

resultsA total of 54,628 COPD patients were included (median [IQR] age: 65 [57-73]; 53.7% male), with 36.4% not receiving respiratory medication within 90 days of diagnosis, and 4.2% on other treatments. Trend analysis revealed that LAMA monotherapy increased from 13.4% in 2010 to 15.1% in 2015 and then declined to 11.0% by 2021. Moreover, LABA-ICS decreased from 17.6% to 8.5% between 2010 and 2018, after which it plateaued. In contrast, LABA-LAMA sharply increased, from 0.6% in 2010 to 9.6% in 2021. LABA monotherapy increased from 2.6% in 2010 to 5.7% in 2021. Triple therapy has remained constant. For reliever-only therapies, SABA increased from 8.5% in 2010 to 14.3% in 2018 and then stabilized, whereas SAMA and SABA-SAMA remained low throughout.

conclusionsShifts in initial pharmacological COPD treatment from 2010 to 2021 likely reflect the introduction of new inhalers and updated management strategies. However, a significant proportion of patients remain without GP prescriptions, which warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

Primary Health CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveAdultAgedBronchodilator AgentsCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNetherlandsPopulation SurveillancePractice Patterns, Physicians'Treatment OutcomeBronchodilator AgentsChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseDrug therapyPrimary health care

Identifiers

PMID39736696
PMCPMC11687194

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.