SynthesisFrontiers in endocrinology2024
The characteristic expression of circulating
Synthesis in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- BMSC-derived exosomes facilitate osteogenesis and ameliorate ageing-related bone loss through restoring Th17/Treg homeostasis via the miR-21/Skp2/FoxO1 axis.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Article
- let-7c-5p promotes fracture healing by downregulating CDK8.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Article
- LncRNA LINC01123-mediated impaired fracture healing through miR-134-5p/XIAP axis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Novel aspects of biochemical assessment of bone remodeling and mineralization.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the characteristics of the circulating microRNA expression profiles in patients with osteoporosis. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using the Web of Science, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), VIP, and WANFANG databases from inception until 1 March 2024. The search strategy employed keywords, encompassing "osteoporosis", "bone loss", or "osteopenia" and "miRNA" or "microRNA". The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) quality assessment scale was used to evaluate the methodological quality. Heterogeneity tests and statistical analyses of all data were performed by Stata 16.0. The differences in microRNA levels between groups were illustrated by the weighted mean difference (WMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: A total of 27 studies were included and analyzed in the meta-analysis, with 2,263 participants. The results showed that Conclusion: Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.