ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2024
Whole-genome sequencing and genomic analysis of four
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Numerous studies have demonstrated that Methods: Based on this finding, we sequenced, assembled, and functionally annotated the whole genomes of four new human isolates from our laboratory: AKK-HX001, AKK-HX002, AKK-HX003, and AKK-HX004. Results: Phylogenetic analysis revealed that all four isolates belonged to the AmII phylogroup, whereas the type strain DSM 22959 is classified within the AmI phylogroup. Moreover, 2,184 shared homologous genes were identified among the four isolates. Functional annotation using the COG, KEGG, and CAZy databases indicated that the functional genes of the four isolates were primarily associated with metabolism. Two antibiotic resistance genes were identified in AKK-HX001 and AKK-HX002, while three resistance genes were detected in AKK-HX003 and AKK-HX004. Additionally, each of the four isolates possessed two virulence genes and three pathogenicity genes, none of which were associated with pathogenicity. The prediction of mobile genetic elements indicated unequal distributions of GIs among the isolates, and a complete CRISPR system was identified in all isolates except AKK-HX003. Two annotated regions of secondary metabolite biosynthesis genes, both belonging to Terpene, were detected using the antiSMASH online tool. Conclusion: These findings indicate that the four
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.