ArticleThe Indian journal of medical research2024
Management of T cell responses by anesthetic drugs-propofol & isoflurane in perioperative breast cancer patients: A prospective hospital-based study.
Article in The Indian journal of medical research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Erratum: Management of T cell responses by anesthetic drugs-propofol & isoflurane in perioperative breast cancer patients: A prospective hospital-based study.The Indian journal of medical research · 2026Article
- Erratum: Management of T cell responses by anesthetic drugs-propofol & isoflurane in perioperative breast cancer patients: A prospective hospital-based study.The Indian journal of medical research · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background & objectives The choice of anesthetic for better perioperative conservation of immune responses has always been contentious. This study investigated the differential impact of the intravenous anesthetic, propofol, and the volatile anesthetic, isoflurane on the T cell immune responses, if any, among individuals going through perioperative breast cancer. Methods Perioperative blood samples (preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative) collected from participants with breast cancer in two arms namely isoflurane arm (n=50) and the propofol arm (n=50) were analyzed for T cell immune response using flow cytometry and ELISA. The interactions of anesthetics with CD4/CD8 were probed with molecular docking and molecular dynamic (MD) simulations. Results Linear mixed model analysis showed that isoflurane in comparison to propofol inhibited CD4+ helper (Th) [β-coefficient: -8.75; 95% CI: -13.00 to -4.51] and CD19+ B cell (β: -7.51; 95% CI: -15.46 to 0.44) frequencies during the intraoperative period in perioperative breast cancer patients. Further, interleukin (IL)-10 and IL-12 were significantly increased during the intra- and postoperative periods in the isoflurane group as compared to the propofol group. Molecular docking (MD) validated propofol's better binding energy with CD4/CD8 than isoflurane. MD simulations propagated that in contrast to isoflurane, propofol formed a more compact and stabilized structure with CD4/CD8, making the amino acid residues on the surface of CD4/CD8 inaccessible for any interaction. Interpretation & conclusions The clinical observations and the in silico findings exhibited that propofol in comparison to isoflurane better regulated T cell immuno-inflammatory response in perioperative breast cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.