ArticleNeurogastroenterology and motility2026
Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Gastric Motility in Conscious Rats.
Article in Neurogastroenterology and motility, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Gastroparesis Phenotyping: Current Methods and Emerging Opportunities With Magnetic Resonance Imaging.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Review
- Interoception network in the rat brain.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2026Article
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Gastric Motility in Conscious Rats.Neurogastroenterology and motility · 2026Article
- Dynamic Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Whole-Stomach Motility in Rats.NMR in biomedicine · 2025Article
- Influence of isoflurane and propofol on gastric slow wave patterns and pacing efficacy in pigs.American journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionGastrointestinal (GI) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) enables simultaneous assessment of gastric peristalsis, emptying, and intestinal filling and transit. However, GI MRI in animals typically requires anesthesia, which complicates physiology and confounds interpretation and translation to humans. This study aimed to establish GI MRI in conscious rats, and for the first time, characterize GI motor functions in awake versus anesthetized conditions.
methodsFourteen Sprague-Dawley rats were acclimated to remain awake, still, and minimally stressed during MRI. GI MRI was performed under both awake and anesthetized conditions following voluntary consumption of a contrast-enhanced test meal.
resultsAwake rats remained physiologically stable during MRI, giving rise to gastric emptying of 23.7% ± 1.4% at 48 min and robust peristaltic contractions propagating through the antrum at 0.72 ± 0.04 mm/s, with a relative amplitude of 40.7% ± 2.3% and a frequency of 5.1 ± 0.1 cycles per minute. Under anesthesia, gastric emptying was approximately halved, mainly due to a significant reduction in peristaltic contraction amplitude, rather than the change in propagation speed, whereas the contraction frequency remained unchanged. Additionally, the small intestine showed faster filling and stronger motility in awake rats.
conclusionThis study demonstrates the feasibility of GI MRI in awake rats and highlights notable differences in gastric and intestinal motility between awake and anesthetized states. Our protocol provides a novel and valuable framework for preclinical studies of GI physiology and pathophysiology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.