ArticleScientific reports2024
Evaluation of serum galectin-3 concentration as a potential biomarker in exudative-type age-related macular degeneration.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The utility of aqueous and serum apolipoprotein E and galectin-3 as biomarkers of neuroinflammation in glaucoma.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluation of serum YKL-40 and Galectin-3 as predictive biomarkers for proliferative vitreoretinopathy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachment: a prospective comparative study.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Pleiotropic regulatory mechanisms and targeted therapeutic prospects of Galectin-3 in aging-related diseases.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the effect of serum galectin-3 on naive neovascular AMD and its use as a serum marker by revealing the variation in this molecule between patient and control groups. Fifty-six naive neovascular AMD patients and 30 healthy control age-matched healthy subjects were included in this prospective case‒control study. Blood samples were obtained and used for analysis of complete blood count; High sensitivity C-reactive protein (HsCRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), low-density lipoprotein (LDL), high-density lipoprotein (HDL), triglyceride (TG), total cholesterol, homocysteine, HbA1c and galectin-3 levels. The average HsCRP level in the AMD group was significantly higher than that in the control group (p < 0.001). The median leukocyte count was significantly higher in the AMD group than in the control group (p < 0.001). Total cholesterol, LDL and TG levels were significantly higher in the AMD group than in the control group (p < 0.001; in all comparisons). The mean HDL level was significantly lower in the AMD group than in the control group (p < 0.001). The mean galectin-3 level was 8.79 ± 0.55 in the AMD group and 6.55 ± 0.55 in the control group. There was a statistically significant increase in galectin-3 levels in the AMD group (p < 0.001). There was a significant positive correlation between CMT and galectin-3 levels in the control (r = 0.495, p = 0.005) and AMD (r = 0.776, p < 0.001) groups. This study reports that serum Gal-3 concentration was higher in the AMD group compared to the control group and positively correlated with CMT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.