ArticleScientific reports2024
Association between constipation and incident chronic kidney disease in the UK Biobank study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of Electronic Health Data-Based Frailty Assessment Tools for Prediction of Adverse Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease.Nephrology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2026Article
- Host factors dictate gut microbiome alterations in chronic kidney disease more strongly than kidney function.Nature microbiology · 2026Article
- A guide to uraemic toxicity.Nature reviews. Nephrology · 2026Review
- Association between constipation and the urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio in adults: the NHANES 2009-2010.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Despite previous studies supporting a close relationship between constipation and chronic kidney disease (CKD), the potential impact of constipation on incident CKD and the role of laxatives remains uncertain. We analyzed longitudinal data from the UK Biobank, which links baseline assessment data with follow-up data from hospital episode statistics and general practice records. Constipation was defined with diagnostic codes or regular use of laxatives at baseline as reported in the questionnaire. Cox proportional hazard models were used to evaluate the association between constipation and incident CKD. After excluding individuals with pre-existing CKD or missing covariates, 118,020 participants with general practice follow-up data were included in the main analysis. Over a median follow-up of 7.4 years, 6,833 (5.8%) patients developed CKD. Constipation was significantly associated with increased risk of CKD development in the multivariable adjusted models (hazard ratio [HR] 1.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.37-1.67) for ICD-defined constipation, HR 1.34, 95% CI 1.23-1.47 for constipation defined by ICD codes or laxative use). Patients with ICD-defined constipation, even when taking laxatives, were found to have a higher risk of incident CKD than those without constipation (HR 1.42, 95% CI 1.08-1.85). We found no moderating effects of laxative use on the association between constipation and incident CKD. Constipation is independently associated with incident CKD in the large population-based longitudinal cohort. These findings highlight constipation as a potential risk factor or predictor of CKD development. Further research is warranted to elucidate the role of laxatives in controlled study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.