Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738685›Full record

ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024

Development and validation of a web-based calculator for determining the risk of psychological distress based on machine learning algorithms: A cross-sectional study of 342 lung cancer patients.

Xu Tian, Haoyang Li, Feili Li, María F Jiménez-Herrera, Yi Ren, Hongcai Shang

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xu Tian *Division of Science & Technology and Foreign Affairs, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, 400020, China.
Haoyang Li *School of Data Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shenzhen, 518172, China.
Feili LiDepartment of Nursing, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Chongqing, 400020, China.
María F Jiménez-HerreraNursing Department, Universitat Rovira I Virgili, 43002, Tarragona, Spain.
Yi RenDepartment of Classic Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital, Jiangbei District, No. 6 of the 7Th Branch of Panxi Road, Chongqing, 400020, China. cqszyyrenyi@163.com.
Hongcai ShangDongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing, 101402, China. shanghongcai@126.com.

Funding

Chongqing medical scientific research project (Joint project of Chongqing Health Commission and Science and Technology Bureau) 2024MSXM100
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly and accurate identification of the risk of psychological distress allows for timely intervention and improved prognosis. Current methods for predicting psychological distress among lung cancer patients using readily available data are limited. This study aimed to develop a robust machine learning (ML) model for determining the risk of psychological distress among lung cancer patients.

methodsA cross-sectional study was designed to collect data from 342 lung cancer patients. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. Model training and validation were conducted with bootstrap resampling method. Fivefold cross-validation evaluated and optimized the model with parameter tuning. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.

resultsThe model identified seven independent risk factors of psychological distress: residence (β = 0.141), diagnosis duration (β = 0.055), TNM stage (β = 0.098), pain severity (β = 0.067), perceived stigma (β = 0.052), illness perception (β = 0.100), and coping style (β = 0.097). Among the eight ML algorithms evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm demonstrated the highest performance with AUROC values of 0.988, 0.945, and 0.922 for the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The model's results were further explained using SHAP, which revealed the importance and contribution of each risk factor to the overall distress risk. A web-based tool was developed based on this model to facilitate clinical use.

conclusionThe XGBoost classifier demonstrated exceptional performance, and clinical implementation of the web-based risk calculator can serve as an easy-to-use tool for health practitioners to formulate early prevention and intervention strategies.

Indexed as

InternetLung NeoplasmsMachine LearningPsychological DistressAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAgedAlgorithmsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsStress, PsychologicalFactor modelLung cancerMachine learningModel explainabilityPsychological distress

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.