ArticleSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2024
Development and validation of a web-based calculator for determining the risk of psychological distress based on machine learning algorithms: A cross-sectional study of 342 lung cancer patients.
Article in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modeling distress in cancer patients using a fuzzy logic approach based on expert consensus.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Integration of Traditional Chinese Medicine and Psychotherapy in Mental Health: A Narrative Review of Mechanisms, Clinical Evidence, and Future Directions.Neuropsychiatric disease and treatment · 2026Review
- Predicting psychological distress in informal caregivers of older people with dementia: development and interpretation of a nomogram and XGBoost model.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- [Application of Explainable Deep Learning in Differentiating Benign from Malignant Pulmonary Space-occupying Lesions and Classifying Pathological Subtypes of Lung Cancer].Zhongguo fei ai za zhi = Chinese journal of lung cancer · 2025Article
- Sleep disturbances predict nine-year panic disorder chronicity: The sleep-panic nexus theory with machine learning insights.Journal of anxiety disorders · 2025Article
- Identification of Symptom Clusters and Sentinel Symptoms During Radiotherapy in Lung Cancer Patients: A Longitudinal Study.Cancer management and research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeEarly and accurate identification of the risk of psychological distress allows for timely intervention and improved prognosis. Current methods for predicting psychological distress among lung cancer patients using readily available data are limited. This study aimed to develop a robust machine learning (ML) model for determining the risk of psychological distress among lung cancer patients.
methodsA cross-sectional study was designed to collect data from 342 lung cancer patients. Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) was used for feature selection. Model training and validation were conducted with bootstrap resampling method. Fivefold cross-validation evaluated and optimized the model with parameter tuning. Feature importance was assessed using SHapley additive exPlanations (SHAP) method.
resultsThe model identified seven independent risk factors of psychological distress: residence (β = 0.141), diagnosis duration (β = 0.055), TNM stage (β = 0.098), pain severity (β = 0.067), perceived stigma (β = 0.052), illness perception (β = 0.100), and coping style (β = 0.097). Among the eight ML algorithms evaluated, the extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) algorithm demonstrated the highest performance with AUROC values of 0.988, 0.945, and 0.922 for the training, validation, and test sets, respectively. The model's results were further explained using SHAP, which revealed the importance and contribution of each risk factor to the overall distress risk. A web-based tool was developed based on this model to facilitate clinical use.
conclusionThe XGBoost classifier demonstrated exceptional performance, and clinical implementation of the web-based risk calculator can serve as an easy-to-use tool for health practitioners to formulate early prevention and intervention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39738685What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.