Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738723›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Machine learning algorithms in constructing prediction models for assisted reproductive technology (ART) related live birth outcomes.

Junwei Peng, Xiaoyujie Geng, Yiyue Zhao, Zhijin Hou, Xin Tian, Xinyi Liu, Yuanyuan Xiao, Yang Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junwei Peng *Reproductive Medicine Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xiaoyujie Geng *Reproductive Medicine Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yiyue ZhaoReproductive Medicine Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Zhijin HouReproductive Medicine Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xin TianDivision of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Xinyi LiuDivision of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China.
Yuanyuan XiaoDivision of Epidemiology and Health Statistics, School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China. 33225647@qq.com.
Yang LiuReproductive Medicine Department, Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China. 13518735544@163.com.

Funding

Academic Leader of Talent Echelon Construction of the Second Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University RCTDXS-202304the First-Class Discipline Team of Kunming Medical University 2024XKTDTS16the Yunnan Revitalization Talent Support Program XDYC-MY-2022-0057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently applicable models for predicting live birth outcomes in patients who received assisted reproductive technology (ART) have methodological or study design limitations that greatly obstruct their dissemination and application. Models suitable for Chinese couples have not yet been identified. We conducted a retrospective study by using a database includes a total of 11,938 couples who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment between January 2015 and December 2022 in a medical institution of southwest China Yunnan province. Multiple candidate predictors were screened out by using the importance scores. Four machine learning (ML) algorithms including random forest, extreme gradient boosting, light gradient boosting machine and binary logistic regression were used to construct prediction models. An initial assessment of the predictive performance was conducted and validated by using cross-validation and bootstrap methods. A total of seven predictors were identified, namely maternal age, duration of infertility, basal follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), progressive sperm motility, progesterone (P) on HCG day, estradiol (E2) on HCG day, and luteinizing hormone (LH) on HCG day. Of the four predictive models, the random forest model and the logistic regression model were considered to have the optimal performance, with the areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) curves of 0.671 (95% CI 0.630-0.713) and 0.674 (95% CI 0.627-0.720). The Brier scores were 0.183 (95% CI 0.170-0.196) and 0.183 (95% CI 0.170-0.196), respectively. Considering the simplicity of model fitting, we recommend the logistic regression model as the best predictive model for live birth. Furthermore, maternal age, P on HCG day and E2 on HCG day were deemed to have the highest contribution to model prediction.

Indexed as

Live BirthMachine LearningReproductive Techniques, AssistedAdultAlgorithmsChinaFemaleFertilization in VitroHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMaternal AgePregnancyRetrospective StudiesROC CurveClinical prediction modelInfertilityIn vitro fertilizationLive birthMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID39738723
PMCPMC11685426

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.