Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39738783›Full record

SynthesisScientific reports2024

The effects of high-intensity interval training on cognitive performance: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Kaihang Liu, Wei Zhao, Congcong Li, Ying Tian, Lijuan Wang, Jingyi Zhong, Xu Yan, Yezheng Wang, Liyan Wang, Hongbiao Wang

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Clinicopathological predictors of central lymph node metastasis in clinically node-negative papillary thyroid carcinoma: a retrospective cohort analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Kaihang LiuCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Wei ZhaoCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Congcong LiCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Ying TianCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Lijuan WangCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Jingyi ZhongCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Xu YanCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Yezheng WangCollege of Sports Science, Shenyang Normal University, Shenyang, China.
Liyan WangCollege of Rehabilitation Sciences, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Hongbiao WangDepartment of Physical Education, Shanghai University of Medicine and Health Sciences, Shanghai, China. wanghb@sumhs.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive decline is an important feature of an aging population. Despite the large body of research investigating the effects of high-intensity interval training (HIIT) on cognitive performance, reports of its effectiveness are inconsistent and it is difficult to determine what factors moderate these effects. The purpose of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis of existing randomised controlled trials investigating the effects of HIIT on various domains of cognitive performance, and to further examine the intervention cycle and age-related moderating effects. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across a range of databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Scopus, and EBSCO. The meta-analysis included data from 20 RCT studies. The results of the analyses demonstrated that HIIT significantly enhanced information processing (SMD = 0.33, 95% CI: 0.15-0.52, P = 0.0005), executive function (SMD = 0.38, 95% CI: 0.26 - 0.50, P < 0.00001), and memory (SMD = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.07-0.35, P = 0.004). Subgroup analyses demonstrated that HIIT enhanced information processing in individuals aged 60 and above, improved executive functioning in individuals of all ages, and enhanced memory in individuals aged 30 to 60. Acute HIIT improved executive function, less than 8 weeks of HIIT improved executive function and memory, and more than 8 weeks of HIIT improved information processing, executive function and memory. The findings of this study indicate that HIIT has a beneficial effect on cognitive performance. Chronic HIIT represents a potential non-pharmacological intervention for cognitive health. Further high-quality research is required to validate and extend these findings.

Indexed as

CognitionHigh-Intensity Interval TrainingAgedExecutive FunctionFemaleHumansMaleMemoryMiddle AgedRandomized Controlled Trials as Topic

Identifiers

PMID39738783
PMCPMC11685461

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.