ArticleAnnals of hematology2025
Validation and improvement of the molecular international prognostic scoring system in Chinese patients with myelodysplastic syndromes.
Article in Annals of hematology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The role and mechanism of epigenetics in anticancer drug-induced cardiotoxicity.Basic research in cardiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Various prognostic models have been proposed to improve the accuracy of prognostic assessment for Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS). Recently, the Molecular International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-M) has been developed. Here, we validated the accuracy of IPSS-M in Chinese MDS patients, and proposed a prognostic model more suitable for Chinese patients. We analyzed the clinical, molecular and cytogenetic data of 798 primary MDS patients, and compared the accuracy of IPSS-R and IPSS-M in predicting overall survival (OS) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation. Using Cox proportional hazards model, we screened out 14 genes that had significant impacts on OS and AML progression. In our study, 44.86% of individuals were reclassified from IPSS-R to IPSS-M, of whom 64.80% were upstaged and 35.2% were downstaged. IPSS-M showed better performance than IPSS-R in predicting AML transformation (C-index: 0.84 vs. 0.81), but it was similar to IPSS-R in OS (C-index: 0.77 vs. 0.76). By combining age, mutational data and IPSS-R, we developed a new prognostic model more suitable for the Chinese patients (c-index was 0.81 for OS and 0.89 for AML transformation, respectively).
Indexed as
Identifiers
39738836What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.