ArticlePloS one2024
Healthy core: Harmonizing brain MRI for supporting multicenter migraine classification studies.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Application of machine learning in migraine classification: a call for study design standardization and global collaboration.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Multicenter and multi-scanner imaging studies may be necessary to ensure sufficiently large sample sizes for developing accurate predictive models. However, multicenter studies, incorporating varying research participant characteristics, MRI scanners, and imaging acquisition protocols, may introduce confounding factors, potentially hindering the creation of generalizable machine learning models. Models developed using one dataset may not readily apply to another, emphasizing the importance of classification model generalizability in multi-scanner and multicenter studies for producing reproducible results. This study focuses on enhancing generalizability in classifying individual migraine patients and healthy controls using brain MRI data through a data harmonization strategy. We propose identifying a 'healthy core'-a group of homogeneous healthy controls with similar characteristics-from multicenter studies. The Maximum Mean Discrepancy (MMD) in Geodesic Flow Kernel (GFK) space is employed to compare two datasets, capturing data variabilities and facilitating the identification of this 'healthy core'. Homogeneous healthy controls play a vital role in mitigating unwanted heterogeneity, enabling the development of highly accurate classification models with improved performance on new datasets. Extensive experimental results underscore the benefits of leveraging a 'healthy core'. We utilized two datasets: one comprising 120 individuals (66 with migraine and 54 healthy controls), and another comprising 76 individuals (34 with migraine and 42 healthy controls). Notably, a homogeneous dataset derived from a cohort of healthy controls yielded a significant 25% accuracy improvement for both episodic and chronic migraineurs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.