ArticlePloS one2024
Enhancement of vindoline and catharanthine production in Catharanthus roseus by LED light and plasma activated water.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transcriptomic profiling and oxidative stress responses of Catharanthus roseus under short-term LED light exposure.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Red light and biostimulants containing arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi enhance ajmalicine and serpentine production in Catharanthus roseus under indoor conditions.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to increase the concentrations of vindoline (VDL) and catharanthine (CAT) in Catharanthus roseus plants cultivated in an indoor farming system using artificial lighting and plasma-activated water (PAW). After a 61-days pre-treatment period under fluorescent lamps, plants were exposed to four treatments: white light (W) from the same fluorescent lamps, red light (R) from LEDs, W with PAW, and R with PAW. These combinations were evaluated at two sampling times: 45 days (T1) and 70 days (T2) after the end of pre-treatment (DAP). Results showed that R combined with PAW significantly increased VDL and CAT concentrations compared to other combinations. In particular, with PAW, R produced significantly higher VDL and CAT concentrations than W, while without PAW, VDL and CAT concentrations were comparable under W and R. Regardless of the light conditions, VDL and CAT concentrations were higher with PAW. Moreover, VDL and CAT concentrations increased from T1 to T2, reaching higher levels under R or PAW at T2. At the same sampling time, VDL and CAT levels were generally higher in plants exposed to R and in those treated with PAW. The highest VDL and CAT concentrations were observed with combined R and PAW at T2. The study concluded that: (1) VDL and CAT concentrations increase with plant age; (2) PAW enhances VDL and CAT concentrations, with its effect becoming more pronounced from T1 to T2; (3) R contributes to VDL and CAT biosynthesis, but its impact becomes significant only when combined with PAW and its effect is amplified from T1 to T2; (4) regardless of the sampling time, the treatment with R and PAW maximizes the VDL and CAT concentrations; (5) R combined with PAW at T2 is the most effective treatment; (6) if harvest timing cannot be delayed, using R and PAW offers substantial benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.