Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39739892›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Ensemble learning driven Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks-based Lung Cancer classification.

Abdul Rahaman Wahab Sait, Eid AlBalawi, Ramprasad Nagaraj

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Abdul Rahaman Wahab SaitDepartment of Archives and Communication, King Faisal University, Hofuf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0001-5445-7899
Eid AlBalawiDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Science and Information Technology, King Faisal University, Al Hofuf, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.
Ramprasad NagarajDepartment of Biochemistry, S S Hospital, S S Institute of Medical Sciences & Research Centre, Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences, Davangere, Karnataka, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Early Lung Cancer (LC) detection is essential for reducing the global mortality rate. The limitations of traditional diagnostic techniques cause challenges in identifying LC using medical imaging data. In this study, we aim to develop a robust LC detection model. Positron Emission Tomography / Computed Tomography (PET / CT) images are utilized to comprehend the metabolic and anatomical data, leading to optimal LC diagnosis. In order to extract multiple LC features, we enhance MobileNet V3 and LeViT models. The weighted sum feature fusion technique is used to generate unique LC features. The extracted features are classified using spline functions, including linear, cubic, and B-spline of Kolmogorov-Arnold Networks (KANs). We ensemble the outcomes using the soft-voting approach. The model is generalized using the Lung-PET-CT-DX dataset. Five-fold cross-validation is used to evaluate the model. The proposed LC detection model achieves an impressive accuracy of 99.0% with a minimal loss of 0.07. In addition, limited resources are required to classify PET / CT images. The high performance underscores the potential of the proposed LC detection model in providing valuable and optimal results. The study findings can significantly improve clinical practice by presenting sophisticated and interpretable outcomes. The proposed model can be enhanced by integrating advanced feature fusion techniques.

Indexed as

Lung NeoplasmsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID39739892
PMCPMC11687918

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.