ArticleAmerican journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses2025
Use of Machine Learning Models to Predict Microaspiration Measured by Tracheal Pepsin A.
Article in American journal of critical care : an official publication, American Association of Critical-Care Nurses, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundEnteral feeding intolerance, a common type of gastrointestinal dysfunction leading to underfeeding, is associated with increased mortality. Tracheal pepsin A, an indicator of microaspiration, was found in 39% of patients within 24 hours of enteral feeding. Tracheal pepsin A is a potential biomarker of enteral feeding intolerance.
objectiveTo identify predictors of microaspiration (tracheal or oral pepsin A). It was hypothesized that variables predicting the presence of tracheal pepsin A might be similar to predictors of enteral feeding intolerance.
methodsIn this secondary analysis, machine learning models were fit for 283 adults receiving mechanical ventilation who had tracheal and oral aspirates obtained every 12 hours for up to 14 days. Pepsin A levels were measured using the proteolytic enzyme assay method, and values of 6.25 ng/mL or higher were classified as indicating microaspiration. Demographics, comorbidities, and variables associated with enteral feeding were analyzed with 3 machine learning models-random forest, XGBoost, and support vector machines with recursive feature elimination-using 5-fold cross-validation tuning.
resultsRandom forest for tracheal pepsin A was the best-performing model (area under the curve, 0.844 [95% CI, 0.792-0.897]; accuracy, 87.55%). The top 20 predictors of tracheal pepsin A were identified.
conclusionFour predictor variables for tracheal pepsin A (microaspiration) are also reported predictors of enteral feeding intolerance, supporting the exploration of tracheal pepsin A as a potential biomarker of enteral feeding intolerance. Identification of predictor variables using machine learning models may facilitate treatment of patients at risk for enteral feeding intolerance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.