ArticleHealth science reports2025
Assessing Glioblastoma Treatment Response Using Machine Learning Approach Based on Magnetic Resonance Images Radiomics: An Exploratory Study.
Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- RetractedRETRACTION: "2025
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Assessing treatment response in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) tumors necessitates developing more objective and quantitative approaches. A machine learning-based approach is presented in this exploratory study for GBM patients' treatment response assessment based on radiomics extracted from magnetic resonance (MR) images. Methods: MR images from 77 GBM patients were acquired at two post-surgery stages and preprocessed. From these images, 107 radiomics were extracted from the segmented tumoral cavities. The most informative features for training machine learning (ML) classifiers were identified using the Spearman correlation analysis of features retained by the forward sequential and LASSO algorithms. Applied machine learning models included support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), AdaBoost, categorical boosting (CatBoost), light gradient boosting machine (LightGBM), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), Naïve Bayes (NB) and logistic regression (LR). Ten-fold cross-validation was used to validate the models. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 27; Results: The Naïve Bayes classifier demonstrated the highest performance among the trained models, achieving an AUC (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve) of 0.86 ± 0.13 when trained on the seven features selected by the forward sequential algorithm and an AUC of 0.84 ± 0.14 when trained using the five features chosen by the LASSO algorithm. The second-best performance was observed with the KNN classifier, which achieved an AUC of 0.80 ± 0.17 when trained on the features selected by the forward sequential algorithm. Conclusion: Findings demonstrated that MRI-based radiomics could be used as distinctive features to train ML models for GBM patients' treatment response assessment. Trained ML classifiers based on these features serve as aiding tools to expedite the quantitative assessment of GBM patients' treatment response besides qualitative evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.