ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2024
Quantitative ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography biomarkers in diabetic retinopathy and association with treatment and progression.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To determine if demographic factors and calculated areas of nonperfusion (NP) and neovascularization (NV) on ultra-widefield (UWF) fluorescein angiography (FA) in the eyes of patients with diabetes are associated with treatment with intravitreal injections (IVIs), panretinal photocoagulation (PRP), and diabetic retinopathy (DR) progression. Patients and Methods: This retrospective, cross-sectional study included 363 patients (651 eyes) treated at the University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center between January 2009 and May 2018. Eligible participants were 18 years or older diagnosed with diabetes who received UWF FA. Patients with previous PRP or poor-quality images were excluded. Main outcome measures included comparison analyses of measured surface areas in millimeters squared (mm Results: Our cohort received 3,041 IVIs and 878 PRP treatments with a mean follow-up of 915 days (SD ±714). IVIs were positively associated with posterior NP (difference, 1.15 mm Conclusion: Areas of NP and NV on UWF FA demonstrated associations with PRP and IVIs in DR patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.