ArticleFrontiers in public health2024
Smoking-attributable peptic ulcer disease mortality worldwide: trends from 1990 to 2021 and projections to 2046 based on the global burden of disease study.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phytochemical-driven angiogenesis and mucosal regeneration in gastric ulcer healing: molecular mechanisms, preclinical evidence, and translational perspectives.Molecular biology reports · 2026Review
- Article
- A Comprehensive Analysis of Therapeutic Potential of Medicinal Plant Extracts to Treat Ethanol-Induced Gastric Ulcer.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Article
- Association between oral health status and peptic ulcer disease: evidence from a nationally representative survey in Hungary.Frontiers in oral health · 2026Article
- Trends and projections of IHD burden attributable to dietary high sodium and kidney dysfunction in G20 countries, 1990-2050.PloS one · 2026Article
- Seasonal variation in hospitalizations for peptic ulcer disease: A five-year retrospective study from Latvia.PloS one · 2026Article
- Impact of tobacco exposure on global deaths of digestive diseases: Findings from 1990-2021 and projected trends to 2042.Tobacco induced diseases · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Smoking is a major risk factor for peptic ulcer disease (PUD) mortality. This study aims to analyze global trends in smoking-attributable PUD mortality from 1990 to 2021 and project future trends to 2046. Methods: Data were obtained from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021. We calculated age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) and estimated annual percentage changes (EAPC) for smoking-attributable PUD mortality. Bayesian Age-Period-Cohort models were used to project future trends. Results: From 1990 to 2021, global smoking-attributable PUD deaths decreased from 48,900 to 29,400, with the ASMR declining from 1.2 to 0.3 per 100,000 (EAPC: -4.25%). High-income regions showed faster declines, while some low- and middle-income countries experienced slower progress or even increases. Projections suggest a continued global decline in smoking-attributable PUD mortality to 2046, with persistent regional disparities. By 2046, the global ASMR is expected to decrease to approximately 0.1 per 100,000, with higher rates persisting in certain regions such as the Solomon Islands (3.7 per 100,000) and Cambodia (1.6 per 100,000). Conclusion: While global smoking-attributable PUD mortality has significantly decreased and is projected to continue declining, substantial regional disparities persist. These findings underscore the need for targeted tobacco control interventions, particularly in high-risk regions, to further reduce the global burden of smoking-attributable PUD mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.