Evidence mapPaperPMID 39741986Full record

ArticleDigital health

Deep learning-based automated tool for diagnosing diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Qincheng Qiao, Juan Cao, Wen Xue, Jin Qian, Chuan Wang, Qi Pan, Bin Lu, Qian Xiong, Li Chen, Xinguo Hou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Qincheng QiaoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7900-2984
Juan CaoDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Wen XueDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7688-8226
Jin QianSchool of Software, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Chuan WangDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Qi PanDepartment of Endocrinology, Beijing Hospital, Beijing, China.
Bin LuDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Huadong Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qian XiongDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Gonghui Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Li ChenDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Xinguo HouDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Qilu Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is a common complication of diabetes, and its early identification is crucial for improving patient outcomes. Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) can non-invasively detect changes in corneal nerve fibers (CNFs), making it a potential tool for the early diagnosis of DPN. However, the existing CNF analysis methods have certain limitations, highlighting the need to develop a reliable automated analysis tool. Methods: This study is based on data from two independent clinical centers. Various popular deep learning (DL) models have been trained and evaluated for their performance in CCM image segmentation using DL-based image segmentation techniques. Subsequently, an image processing algorithm was designed to automatically extract and quantify various morphological parameters of CNFs. To validate the effectiveness of this tool, it was compared with manually annotated datasets and ACCMetrics, and the consistency of the results was assessed using Bland--Altman analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Results: The U2Net model performed the best in the CCM image segmentation task, achieving a mean Intersection over Union (mIoU) of 0.8115. The automated analysis tool based on U2Net demonstrated a significantly higher consistency with the manually annotated results in the quantitative analysis of various CNF morphological parameters than the previously popular automated tool ACCMetrics. The area under the curve for classifying DPN using the CNF morphology parameters calculated by this tool reached 0.75. Conclusions: The DL-based automated tool developed in this study can effectively segment and quantify the CNF parameters in CCM images. This tool has the potential to be used for the early diagnosis of DPN, and further research will help validate its practical application value in clinical settings.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligencecorneal confocal microscopedeep learningdiabetic neuropathy

Identifiers

PMID39741986
PMCPMC11686633

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.