Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742294›Full record

ArticleiMeta2024

Gut

Andong Zha, Ming Qi, Yuankun Deng, Hao Li, Nan Wang, Chengming Wang, Simeng Liao, Dan Wan, Xia Xiong, Peng Liao and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in iMeta, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Effects ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Andong ZhaKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.ORCID 0000-0003-0319-7630
Ming QiLaboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.
Yuankun DengKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.
Hao LiKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.
Nan WangKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.
Chengming WangKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.
Simeng LiaoKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.
Dan WanLaboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.
Xia XiongLaboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.
Peng LiaoLaboratory of Animal Nutritional Physiology and Metabolic Process, Key Laboratory of Agro-Ecological Processes in Subtropical Region, National Engineering Laboratory for Pollution Control and Waste Utilization in Livestock and Poultry Production, Institute of Subtropical Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Sciences Changsha China.
Jing WangKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.
Yulong YinKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.
Bi'e TanKey Laboratory of Hunan Province for the Products Quality Regulation of Livestock and Poultry College of Animal Science and Technology, Hunan Agricultural University Changsha China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gut microbiome is crucial for lipid metabolism in humans and animals. However, how specific gut microbiota and their associated metabolites impact fat deposition remains unclear. In this study, we demonstrated that the colonic microbiome of lean and obese pigs differentially contributes to fat deposition, as evidenced by colonic microbiota transplantation experiments. Notably, the higher abundance of

Indexed as

Bifidobacterium pseudocatenulatumbile salt hydrolasefat depositionlithocholic acidsecondary bile acid biosynthesis

Identifiers

PMID39742294
PMCPMC11683477

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.