Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39742385›Full record

ArticleJournal of health monitoring2024

Utilisation of medical services in Germany and Europe - Results of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3, 2018 - 2020).

Laura Krause, Franziska Prütz, Anne Starker, Yong Du, Giselle Sarganas, Ronny Kuhnert, Julia Thom, Alexander Rommel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of health monitoring, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Laura KrauseRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Franziska PrützRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Anne StarkerRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Yong DuRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Giselle SarganasRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Ronny KuhnertRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Julia ThomRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.
Alexander RommelRobert Koch Institute, Department of Epidemiology and Health Monitoring, Berlin, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Needs-based care is a central concern of healthcare policy. A European comparison of the utilisation of medical services can help to assess national data and identify the need for action. Methods: This article describes indicators on the utilisation of outpatient and inpatient services, medical examinations and the use of medicines from the third wave of the European Health Interview Survey (EHIS 3) and compares the results from Germany with the European averages. Results: Age-standardised, the utilisation of medical services in Germany was above the European average without exception, whereby demographic and social differences were similar. Almost all services were utilised more frequently by women and in older age groups. Exceptions are inpatient services and colonoscopy, where there was no difference between the sexes, and more frequent use of psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services and non-prescription medication among younger adults. Specialist medical and dental services were used more frequently in the high education group, psychiatric and psychotherapeutic services as well as inpatient services and prescription medication in the low education group. Conclusions: The European comparison requires a differentiated categorisation of the findings. While the high utilisation in Germany for some evidence-based services (e.g. colonoscopy, dentistry) indicates good access to care, the high inpatient utilisation, for example, is also the subject of critical discussion.

Indexed as

DemographicsDentistryEarly detection of cancerEuropean Health Interview SurveyHospitalMedicationOutpatient carePsychiatryPsychotherapyUtilisation

Identifiers

PMID39742385
PMCPMC11635695

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.