Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39743230›Full record

ReviewClinical transplantation and research2024

Mechanisms of allorecognition and xenorecognition in transplantation.

Il Hee Yun, Jaeseok Yang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical transplantation and research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Il Hee YunThe Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3950-2329
Jaeseok YangThe Research Institute for Transplantation, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5378-7797

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foreign antigen recognition is the ability of immune cells to distinguish self from nonself, which is crucial for immune responses in both invertebrates and vertebrates. In vertebrates, T cells play a pivotal role in graft rejection by recognizing alloantigens presented by antigen-presenting cells through direct, indirect, or semidirect pathways. B cells also significantly contribute to the indirect presentation of antigens to T cells. Innate immune cells, such as dendritic cells, identify pathogen- or danger-associated molecular patterns through pattern recognition receptors, thereby facilitating effective antigen presentation to T cells. Recent studies have shown that innate immune cells, including macrophages and NK cells, can recognize allogeneic or xenogeneic antigens using immune receptors like CD47 or activating NK receptors, instead of pattern recognition receptors. Additionally, macrophages and NK cells are capable of exhibiting memory responses to alloantigens, although these responses are shorter than those of adaptive memory. T cells also recognize xenoantigens through either direct or indirect presentation. Notably, macrophages and NK cells can directly recognize xenoantigens via surface immune receptors in an antibody-independent manner, or they can be activated in an antibody-dependent manner. Advances in our understanding of the recognition mechanisms of adaptive and innate immunity against allogeneic and xenogeneic antigens may improve our understanding of graft rejection.

Indexed as

AlloimmunityNonself recognitionTransplantationTransplantation rejectionXenotransplantation

Identifiers

PMID39743230
PMCPMC11732770

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.