ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Refining cardiac resynchronization therapy: a comprehensive review on the role of advanced multimodality imaging.
Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Dyssynchrony-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Children: Mechanisms, Diagnosis, and Contemporary Management.Pediatric cardiology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) offers significant benefits in symptom alleviation, reduction of rehospitalization rates, and overall survival of patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (rEF). However, despite its proven efficacy, precisely identifying suitable CRT candidates remains a challenge, with a notable proportion of patients experiencing non-response. Accordingly, many attempts have been made to enhance patient selection, and to identify the best imaging parameters to predict the response and survival after CRT implantation. This review article provides a comprehensive overview on the role of multi-modality cardiac imaging in selecting, optimizing, and predicting CRT response and outcomes in HFrEF patients, beginning with an exploration of dyssynchrony types and their impact on HF progression, and an emphasis on the utility of echocardiography in assessing cardiac dyssynchrony. Subsequently, the role of advanced techniques such as speckle tracking and three-dimensional echocardiography, as well as the visual assessment of apical rocking (ApRock) and septal flash (SF) are highlighted. Finally, cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scar data, and novel modalities like four-dimensional flow CMR, together with single-photon emission computed tomography offer additional insights, emerging as valuable predictors of CRT response, and potentially refining the identification of suitable CRT candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.