Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39744211›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024

Cardiac cells and mesenchymal stem cells derived extracellular vesicles: a potential therapeutic strategy for myocardial infarction.

Dan Qin, Xiaobo Wang, Jun Pu, Houxiang Hu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Dan QinDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Xiaobo WangDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Jun PuDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.
Houxiang HuDepartment of Cardiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite improvements in clinical outcomes of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), mortality rates remain high, indicating the need for further understanding of the pathogenesis and developing more effective cardiac protection strategies. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) carry proteins and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) derived from different cardiac cell populations, mainly including cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, endothelial progenitor cells, cardiac progenitor cells, cardiosphere-derived cells, immune cells, fibroblasts and cardiac telocytes have vital roles under both physiological and pathological process such as myocardial infarction (MI). The content of EVs can also indicate the status of their parental cells and serve as a biomarker for monitoring the risk of cardiac injury. Examining these vesicles can offer fresh perspectives on the development of MI and assist in creating innovative treatments. Additionally, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) (MSC-EVs) derived EVs have been shown to have significant potential in cardiac regeneration. In this review, we will discuss the current understanding of the role of EVs in cardiac communication, with a focus on the perspectives of EVs from various cardiac cells and MSCs for their potential uses as cardiac therapies after MI.

Indexed as

cardiac cellscell-cell communicationextracellular vesiclesmesenchymal stem cellsmyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID39744211
PMCPMC11688320

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.