ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2024
Waist-to-height ratio and body roundness index: superior predictors of insulin resistance in Chinese adults and take gender and age into consideration.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Remodelling of body composition surrounding the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes in three longitudinal cohorts.Diabetologia · 2026Article
- Leg fat-to-total fat ratio improves waist-to-height ratio for discriminating metabolic syndrome: a nationwide cross-sectional study.Journal of endocrinological investigation · 2026Article
- Association and diagnostic efficacy of waist-to-height ratio with glycemic control in young and middle-aged adults with early-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus.BMC endocrine disorders · 2026Article
- Are Sustainable and Healthy Eating Behaviors and Levels of Nutritional Knowledge Associated with Obesity and Anthropometric Indicators of Chronic Disease Risk Among Healthcare Workers?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Body roundness index: superior predictors of intramuscular fat infiltration in general population.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Comparison of novel and traditional anthropometric indices: which is the best indicator of frailty in older adults?Aging clinical and experimental research · 2025Article
- Aging-Related Obesity: Unveiling Mitochondrial and Metabolic Dysfunction.Current nutrition reports · 2025Review
- Associations between eight anthropometric indices and Parkinson's disease: a nationwide population-based study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Association Between a Body Shape Index and Body Roundness Index with Prevalence of Psoriasis: A Cross-Sectional Population-Based Study.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Article
- Commentary: The atherogenic index of plasma is associated with an increased risk of diabetes in non-obese adults: a cohort study.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: Metabolic disease has become a global health concern, and insulin resistance (IR) is a crucial underlying mechanism in various metabolic diseases. This study aims to compare the ability of seven anthropometric indicators in predicting IR in the Chinese population, and to find more sensitive and simple anthropometric indicator for early identification of IR. Methods: This prospective cross-sectional study obtained participants' medical history, anthropometric indicators, and serum samples from three hospitals in China. Various anthropometric indicators were calculated, including body mass index (BMI), Waist-to-hip ratio (WHR), waist-to-height ratio (WtHR), conicity index (CI), A Body Shape Index (ABSI), body roundness index (BRI), abdominal volume index (AVI). The evaluation of IR is performed using the homeostasis model assessment-insulin resistance (HOMA-IR). Logistic regression analysis examined the relationship between indicators and HOMA-IR. The ability of the anthropometric indicators to predict IR was analyzed using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Additionally, a stratified analysis was performed to evaluate the ability of the indicators in different age and gender groups. Results: The study included 1,592 adult subjects, with 531 in the non-IR group and 1,061 in the IR group. After adjusting for confounding factors, the anthropometric indicators showed a positive correlation with IR in the general population and across different genders and age groups (OR > 1, Conclusion: WtHR and BRI demonstrated a better ability to predict IR in the overall study population, making them preferred indicators for screening IR, and gender and age are important considerations. In the stratified analysis of different genders or age, BMI, WtHR, BRI, and AVI are also suitable for detecting IR in women or individuals under 60 years old in this study. Clinical trial registration: www.chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR2100054654.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.