Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39745797›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of epidemiology2025

Adjusting for selection bias due to missing eligibility criteria in emulated target trials.

Luke Benz, Rajarshi Mukherjee, Rui Wang, David Arterburn, Heidi Fischer, Catherine Lee, Susan M Shortreed, Sebastien Haneuse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Luke BenzDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-9982-6309
Rajarshi MukherjeeDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, United States.
Rui WangDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5007-193X
David ArterburnKaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, United States.
Heidi FischerDepartment of Research & Evaluation, Kaiser Permanente Southern California, Pasadena, CA 91101, United States.
Catherine LeeDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94158, United States.
Susan M ShortreedBiostatistics Division, Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute, Seattle, WA 98101, United States.
Sebastien HaneuseDepartment of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA 02215, United States.

Funding

Robust methods for missing data in electronic health records-based studiesR01DK128150 · NIDDK · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI HANEUSE, SEBASTIEN · 2021 to 2024
$2.1M
Adjusting for selection bias due to missing eligibility data in electronic health records-based observational studiesF31DK141237 · NIDDK · HARVARD UNIVERSITY D/B/A HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH · PI BENZ, LUKE S · 2024 to 2025
$78k
NIDDK NIH HHS F31 DK141237NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK128150NIH HHS F31 DK141237-01NIH HHS R01 DK128150-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target trial emulation (TTE) is a popular framework for observational studies based on electronic health records (EHRs). A key component of this framework is determining the patient population eligible for inclusion in both a target trial of interest and its observational emulation. Missingness in variables that define eligibility criteria, however, presents a major challenge in determining the eligible population when emulating a target trial with an observational study. In practice, patients with incomplete data are almost always excluded from analysis despite the possibility of selection bias, which can arise when participants with observed eligibility data are fundamentally different than excluded individuals. Despite this, to our knowledge, very little work has been done to mitigate this concern. In this article, we propose a novel conceptual framework to address selection bias in TTE studies, tailored toward time-to-event end points, and we describe estimation and inferential procedures via inverse probability weighting. Under an EHR-based simulation infrastructure, developed to reflect the complexity of EHR data, we characterize common settings under which missing eligibility data pose the threat of selection bias and investigate the ability of the proposed methods to address it. Finally, using EHR databases from Kaiser Permanente, we demonstrate the use of our method to evaluate the effect of bariatric surgery on microvascular outcomes among a cohort of patients with severe obesity with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

Indexed as

Electronic Health RecordsEligibility DeterminationObservational Studies as TopicPatient SelectionHumansResearch DesignSelection Biaselectronic health recordsinverse probability weightingmissing dataselection biastarget trial emulation

Identifiers

PMID39745797
PMCPMC12634130

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.