Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39746396›Full record

SynthesisThe American journal of clinical nutrition2025

Reporting of nutritional screening, status, and intake in trials of nutritional and physical rehabilitation following critical illness: a systematic review.

Reema Rabheru, Anne Langan, Judith Merriweather, Bronwen Connolly, Kevin Whelan, Danielle E Bear

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reema RabheruDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Anne LanganDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Judith MerriweatherCritical Care, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Bronwen ConnollyWellcome-Wolfson Institute for Experimental Medicine, School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom; Department of Physiotherapy, The University of Melbourne, Australia.
Kevin WhelanDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom.
Danielle E BearDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Department of Nutritional Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom; Department of Critical Care, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom. Electronic address: Danielle.e.Bear@kcl.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSurviving critical illness leads to prolonged physical and functional recovery with both nutritional and physical rehabilitation interventions for prevention and treatment being investigated. Nutritional status and adequacy may influence outcome, but no consensus on which nutritional-related variables should be measured and reported in clinical trials exists.

objectivesThis study aimed to undertake a systematic review investigating the reporting of nutritional screening, nutritional status, and nutritional intake/delivery in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating nutritional and/or physical rehabilitation on physical and functional recovery during and following critical illness.

methodsFive electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Science, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Cochrane) were searched (last update 9 August, 2023). Search terms included both free text and standardized indexed terms. Studies included were RCTs assessing nutritional and/or physical interventions either during or following intensive care unit (ICU) admission in adults (18 y or older) with critical illness, and who required invasive mechanical ventilation for any duration during ICU admission. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias tool for RCTs and descriptive data synthesis was performed and presented as counts (%). n t

resultsIn total, 123 RCTs (30 nutritional, 87 physical function, and 6 combined) were included. Further, ≥1 nutritional variable was measured and/or reported in 99 (80%) of the studies including BMI (n = 69), body weight (n = 57), nutritional status (n = 11), nutritional risk (n = 10), energy delivery (n = 41), protein delivery (n = 35), handgrip strength (n = 40), and other nutritional-related muscle variables (n = 41). Only 3 studies were considered to have low risk of bias in all categories.

conclusionsFew RCTs of physical rehabilitation measure and report nutritional or related variables. Future studies should measure and report specific nutritional factors that could impact physical and functional recovery to support interpretation where studies do not show benefit. This protocol was preregistered at PROSPERO as CRD42022315122.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessNutritional StatusNutrition AssessmentHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as Topiccritical illnessfunctional recoveryICUnutritional interventionphysical recoveryphysical rehabilitation intervention

Identifiers

PMID39746396
PMCPMC11923378

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.