ArticleNature communications2025
Meta-EA: a gene-specific combination of available computational tools for predicting missense variant effects.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- A heritability-optimized method for functional prioritization of rare coding variants in complex traits.Nature genetics · 2026Article
- Ultra-rare functional variants reveal early-onset breast cancer risk genes and pathways in the UK Biobank and All of Us Research Program.American journal of human genetics · 2026Article
- Genetic analysis of neurodegenerative diseases.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2026Review
- Study of POLR3A variants in a family trio suggests mutation-specific pathogenetic mechanisms: insights from integrative OMIC approaches.Cell communication and signaling : CCS · 2026Article
- Reclassification of missense variant pathogenicity using ClinGen recommendations for recalibrated PP3/BP4 in silico predictor score thresholds.Genetics in medicine open · 2026Article
- Germline variants inProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Computational methods for estimating missense variant impact suffer from inconsistent performance across genes, which poses a major challenge for their reliable use in clinical practice. While ensemble scores leverage multiple prediction methods to enhance consistency, the overrepresentation of certain genes in the training data can bias their outcomes. To address this critical limitation, we propose a gene-specific ensemble framework trained on reference computational annotations rather than on clinical or experimental data. Accordingly, we generate Meta-EA ensemble scores that achieve comparable performance to the top individual predicting method for each gene set. Incorporating the effects of splicing and the allele frequency of human polymorphisms further enhances the performance of Meta-EA, achieving an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.97 for both gene-balanced and imbalanced clinical assessments. In conclusion, this work leverages the wealth of existing variant impact prediction approaches to generate improved estimations for clinical interpretation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.