ArticleScientific reports2025
Validation of musculoskeletal segmentation model with uncertainty estimation for bone and muscle assessment in hip-to-knee clinical CT images.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in the Musculoskeletal System: Evolving Role in Modern Imaging Practice.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Application of upright multidetector CT in orthopedics and the musculoskeletal system: insights into anatomy, alignment, and biomechanics.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Review
- Side-to-side differences in hip bone mineral density and associated morphological factors.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2026Article
- SwMrNet: A Multi-Target Tissue Segmentation Method for Robust and Accurate Clinical Knee Diagnosis Assistance.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Three-dimensional artificial intelligence-based computed tomography analysis of lower limb muscle volume and fatty degeneration in varus and valgus knee osteoarthritis: a single-center retrospective study.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Lower-limb muscle mass quantification and whole-body muscle loss detection using preoperative computed tomography images in patients with hip disease.International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery · 2025Article
- Varus deformity in medial knee osteoarthritis correlates with fatty degeneration of lower limb muscles: Artificial intelligence-based computed tomography analysis.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Evaluating upper leg muscle volume : the reliability of thigh circumference measurement 10 cm above the patella.Bone & joint research · 2025Article
- Automated segmentation of trunk musculature with a deep CNN trained from sparse annotations in radiation therapy patients with metastatic spine disease: an observational study.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep learning-based image segmentation has allowed for the fully automated, accurate, and rapid analysis of musculoskeletal (MSK) structures from medical images. However, current approaches were either applied only to 2D cross-sectional images, addressed few structures, or were validated on small datasets, which limit the application in large-scale databases. This study aimed to validate an improved deep learning model for volumetric MSK segmentation of the hip and thigh with uncertainty estimation from clinical computed tomography (CT) images. Databases of CT images from multiple manufacturers/scanners, disease status, and patient positioning were used. The segmentation accuracy, and accuracy in estimating the structures volume and density, i.e., mean HU, were evaluated. An approach for segmentation failure detection based on predictive uncertainty was also investigated. The model has improved all segmentation accuracy and structure volume/density evaluation metrics compared to a shallower baseline model with a smaller training database (N = 20). The predictive uncertainty yielded large areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves (AUROCs ≥ .95) in detecting inaccurate and failed segmentations. Furthermore, the study has shown an impact of the disease severity status on the model's predictive uncertainties when applied to a large-scale database. The high segmentation and muscle volume/density estimation accuracy and the high accuracy in failure detection based on the predictive uncertainty exhibited the model's reliability for analyzing individual MSK structures in large-scale CT databases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.