ArticleScientific reports2025
Varying pixel resolution significantly improves deep learning-based carotid plaque histology segmentation.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of 2D and 3D carotid plaque analysis and longitudinalJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Carotid plaques-the buildup of cholesterol, calcium, cellular debris, and fibrous tissues in carotid arteries-can rupture, release microemboli into the cerebral vasculature and cause strokes. The likelihood of a plaque rupturing is thought to be associated with its composition (i.e. lipid, calcium, hemorrhage and inflammatory cell content) and the mechanical properties of the plaque. Automating and digitizing histopathological images of these plaques into tissue specific (lipid and calcified) regions can help us compare histologic findings to in vivo imaging and thereby enable us to optimize medical treatments or interventions for patients based on the composition of plaques. Lack of public datasets and the hypocellular nature of plaques have made applying deep learning to this task difficult. To address this, we sampled 1944 regions of interests from 323 whole slide images and drastically varied their pixel resolution from [Formula: see text] to [Formula: see text] as we anticipated that varying the pixel resolution of histology images can provide neural networks more 'context' that pathologists also rely on. We were able to train Mask R-CNN using regions of interests with varied pixel resolution, with a [Formula: see text] increase in pixel accuracy versus training with patches. The model achieved F1 scores of [Formula: see text] for calcified regions, [Formula: see text] for lipid core with fibrinous material and cholesterol crystals, and [Formula: see text] for fibrous regions, as well as a pixel accuracy of [Formula: see text]. While the F1 score was not calculated for lumen, qualitative results illustrate the model's ability to predict lumen. Hemorrhage was excluded as a class since only one out of 34 carotid endarterectomy specimens had sufficient hemorrhage for annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.