ArticleScientific reports2025
A microfluidics platform for simultaneous evaluation of sensitivity and side effects of anti-cancer drugs using a three-dimensional culture method.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- PK-Informed Microphysiological Systems: From Dynamic Dosing to Quantitative In Vitro-In Vivo Translation.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Review
- A Flexible Metamaterial Absorber via Loss Engineering for Large-Area Ultra-Broadband Infrared Extinction.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- Integrating Bioprinting and Increased Throughput: Next-Generation Models for Cardiac Research.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Review
- Generation and characterization of feline colorectal adenocarcinoma organoids as a preclinical model.The Journal of veterinary medical science · 2025Article
- Prognostic Insights in Feline Mammary Carcinomas: Clinicopathological Factors and the Proposal of a New Staging System.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Organoids are stem cell-derived three-dimensional tissue cultures composed of multiple cell types that recapitulate the morphology and functions of their in vivo counterparts. Organ-on-a-chip devices are tiny chips with interconnected wells and channels designed using a perfusion system and microfluidics to precisely mimic the in vivo physiology and mechanical forces experienced by cells in the body. These techniques have recently been used to reproduce the structure and function of organs in vitro and are expected to be promising alternatives for animal experiments in the future. In the present study, we designed and fabricated an organ-on-a-chip system for mounting organoids from mammary tumor-affected cats (FMT organoids) and normal intestinal organoids from mice (MI organoids) and perfused them with anti-cancer drugs. The effects of drug perfusion on FMT and MI organoids were examined by measuring cell viability and performing genetic analysis. After 48 h of perfusion with toceranib (10 µM) or doxorubicin (1 µM), cell viability of FMT organoids was decreased compared to the non-perfusion condition. The expression of apoptosis-related genes, such as p53 and Caspase-9 was significantly upregulated in FMT organoids with drug perfusion. The rate of cell death drastically differed before and after branching in the device, owing to differences in flow velocity and drug infiltration. Perfusion of MI organoids with toceranib also reduced viability, as observed in FMT organoids; however, this was due to the induction of necrosis rather than apoptosis. In conclusion, our established multi-organoid-on-chip system could be used to evaluate anti-cancer drug sensitivity and side effects in vitro, which might contribute to developing personalized medicine for cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.