ArticleScientific reports2025
Machine learning-based analysis of microfluidic device immobilized C. elegans for automated developmental toxicity testing.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine Learning-Accelerated Analysis ofResearch square · 2026Article
- A Robust, High-Content NAM for Repeatable and Predictive Developmental and Reproductive Toxicity Assessment in C. elegans.Research square · 2026Article
- High-Throughput Toxicity Screening withEnvironmental science & technology · 2026Review
- Alternative methods for developmental toxicity testing: features, status and future directions.Journal of veterinary science · 2025Review
- HarnessingSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- VAB-8/KIF26, LIN-17/Frizzled, and EFN-4/Ephrin control distinct stages of posterior neuroblast migration downstream of the MAB-5/Hox transcription factor in Caenorhabditis elegans.PLoS genetics · 2025Article
- AI-CMCA: a deep learning-based segmentation framework for capillary microfluidic chip analysis.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Benzo[a]pyrene-Induced Developmental Toxicity inToxics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Developmental toxicity (DevTox) tests evaluate the adverse effects of chemical exposures on an organism's development. Although current testing primarily relies on large mammalian models, the emergence of new approach methodologies (NAMs) is encouraging industries and regulatory agencies to evaluate novel assays. C. elegans have emerged as NAMs for rapid toxicity testing because of its biological relevance and suitability to high throughput studies. However, current low-resolution and labor-intensive methodologies prohibit its application for sub-lethal DevTox studies at high throughputs. With the recent advent of the large-scale microfluidic device, vivoChip, we can now rapidly collect 3D high-resolution images of ~ 1000 C. elegans from 24 different populations. While data collection is rapid, analyzing thousands of images remains time-consuming. To address this challenge, we developed a machine-learning (ML)-based image analysis platform using a 2.5D U-Net architecture (vivoBodySeg) that accurately segments C. elegans in images obtained from vivoChip devices, achieving a Dice score of 97.80%. vivoBodySeg processes 36 GB data per device, phenotyping multiple body parameters within 35 min on a desktop PC. This analysis is ~ 140 × faster than the manual analysis. This ML approach delivers highly reproducible DevTox parameters (4-8% CV) to assess the toxicity of chemicals with high statistical power.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.