ArticleNeurosurgical review2025
Comparative outcomes of microsurgical dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZotomy) for intractable neuropathic pain in spinal cord and cauda equina injuries.
Article in Neurosurgical review, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative outcomes of spinal cord stimulation for neuropathic pain: peripheral nerve versus spinal cord lesions.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- A reproducible deep dorsal root entry zone lesioning technique for cervical root avulsion: Outcomes from a clinical series.Surgical neurology international · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Treatment of neuropathic pain in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) and cauda equina injury (CEI) remains challenging. Dorsal root entry zone lesioning (DREZL) or DREZotomy is a viable surgical option for refractory cases. This study aimed to compare DREZL surgical outcomes between patients with SCI and those with CEI and to identify predictors of postoperative pain relief. We retrospectively analyzed 12 patients (6 with SCI and 6 with CEI) with intractable neuropathic pain who underwent DREZL. The data collected were demographic characteristics, pain distribution, and outcomes assessed by numeric pain rating scores. Variables and percentages of pain improvement at 1 year and long-term were statistically compared between the SCI and CEI groups. The demographic characteristics and percentage of patients who experienced pain improvement at 1 year postoperatively did not differ between the groups. Compared with the SCI group, the CEI group presented significantly better long-term pain reduction (p = 0.020) and favorable operative outcomes (p = 0.015). Patients with border zone pain had significantly better long-term pain relief and outcomes than did those with diffuse pain (p = 0.008 and p = 0.010, respectively). Recurrent pain after DREZL occurred in the SCI group but not in the CEI group. DREZL provided superior pain relief in patients with CEI. The presence of border zone pain predicted favorable outcomes. CEI patients or SCI patients with border zone pain are good surgical candidates for DREZL, whereas SCI patients with below-injury diffuse pain are poor candidates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.