Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39747797›Full record

ReviewCurrent topics in behavioral neurosciences2025

Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity: Integrating Memory and Anxiety Impairments in the Early Stages of Alzheimer's Disease.

Mark A Good, David M Bannerman

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current topics in behavioral neurosciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Mark A GoodSchool of Psychology, Cardiff University, Park Place, Cardiff, UK. good@cardiff.ac.uk.
David M BannermanDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A decline in hippocampal function has long been associated with the progression of cognitive impairments in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). The disruption of hippocampal synaptic plasticity [primarily the reduction of long-term potentiation LTP] by excess production of soluble beta-amyloid (Aβ) has long been accepted as the mechanism by which AD pathology impairs memory, at least during the early stages of AD pathogenesis. However, the premise that hippocampal LTP underpins the formation of associative, long-term memories has been challenged. Here, we consider evidence that this canonical view of LTP needs to be refined. Similarly, the view that the hippocampus simply supports memory ignores the wealth of data showing that the hippocampus is functionally heterogeneous along its septo-temporal axis. The ventral (but not the dorsal) hippocampus plays a major role in modulating emotional reactions to conflict. Here, we suggest that hippocampal LTP is not involved in forming long-term associative memories, but instead contributes to the disambiguation of overlapping memories in situations of conflict and associative interference. This conceptualisation of hippocampal synaptic plasticity may help explain how early-stage AD pathology may impact both memory and anxiety.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAnxietyHippocampusMemoryNeuronal PlasticityAnimalsHumansLong-Term PotentiationAMPA receptorsAnxietyAttentionDorsal/ventral synaptic plasticityHippocampusInterferenceLong-term potentiationMemoryNMDA receptors

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.