ArticleNature communications2025
Deciphering the effect of UM171 on human hematopoietic progenitor cell fate through clonal analysis.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Structure-Guided Optimization of a Molecular Glue Targeting the KBTBD4-HDAC1/2 Complex.ChemMedChem · 2026Article
- Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells from human mobilized peripheral blood for gene therapy applications.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2026Article
- Inhibition of inflammation and senescence with azole compound C7 enables expansion of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells.Stem cells translational medicine · 2026Article
- Ex vivo long-term expansion of human hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells as a tool for modeling vector integration sites and clonality.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Article
- Culturing Potential: advances in ex vivo cell culture systems for haematopoietic cell-based regenerative therapies.Regenerative therapy · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ex vivo expansion of hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) requires the maintenance of a stemness state while cells are proliferating. This can be achieved via exposure to UM171 which leads to the degradation of chromatin modifiers and prevents the loss of key epigenetic marks. However, the chromatin landscape varies across populations within the hematopoietic system and the effect of UM171 on self-renewal and differentiation potential of different hematopoietic progenitor cells is less characterized. To address this, we use the CellTag barcoding approach to track the fate of individual stem and progenitor cells during in vitro expansion. We show that, in addition to its HSC self-renewing property, UM171 specifically modulates cell fate of a precursor common to erythroid, megakaryocytic, and mast cells in favor of self-renewal and a mast-bias differentiation trajectory. This differentiation bias can be driven by pro-inflammatory signaling pathways that are activated downstream of UM171 and results in an abundant mast cell population that can be transplanted as part of the graft to populate mice tissues in xenotransplantation studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.