Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39748010›Full record

Trial reportScientific reports2025

Assessment of the efficacy of on-demand tegoprazan therapy in gastroesophageal reflux disease through a randomized controlled trial.

Sun Hyung Kang, Hee Seok Moon, Jae Kyu Sung, Sun Moon Kim, Ki Bae Kim, Seung Woo Lee, Young Sin Cho, Ki Bae Bang, Kyung Ho Song

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. On-Demand Therapy for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.Gastroenterology & hepatology · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sun Hyung KangDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Hee Seok MoonDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Jae Kyu SungDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Sun Moon KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Konyang University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea. islkim@hanmail.net.
Ki Bae KimDepartment of Gastroenterology, Chungbuk National University College of Medicine, Cheong-Ju, Republic of Korea.
Seung Woo LeeDepartment of Gastroenterology, Catholic University of Korea School of Medicine, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
Young Sin ChoDepartment of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Soonchunhyang University, Cheong-Ju, Republic of Korea.
Ki Bae BangDepartment of Gastroenterology, College of Medicine, Dankook University, Cheong-Ju, Republic of Korea.
Kyung Ho SongDepartment of Gastroenterology, CHA Ilsan Medical Center, Ilsan, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) whose symptoms improve with acid-suppression therapy, on-demand treatment could constitute maintenance therapy. This study investigated the comparative efficacy and safety of on-demand tegoprazan and proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy in GERD. From six university hospitals in the Daejeon-Chungcheong region, we enrolled patients with GERD who had experienced symptomatic improvement with acid-suppressive therapy and, using a randomization table, randomly allocated these participants to two groups: to receive either tegoprazan 50 mg + esomeprazole placebo or tegoprazan placebo + esomeprazole 20 mg, respectively. The primary endpoint of this study was the intergroup difference in patient satisfaction with on-demand therapy. Among the 69 participants who completed 8 weeks of on-demand therapy and rated patient satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale, the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups scored an average of 4.31 and 4.15 points, respectively, without any significant intergroup difference. In the tegoprazan group, 26.2% (182/694) of those with episodes experienced symptom improvement within 30 min, which is a significantly higher proportion compared to 16.1% (104/646) in the esomeprazole group. Compared to the esomeprazole group, the tegoprazan group had a significantly shorter time to symptom improvement overall and a significantly higher proportion of patients who improved within 30 min. No serious treatment-emergent adverse events were reported. Tegoprazan is effective as on-demand therapy for GERD and offers the expectation of faster symptom improvement than with PPIs. Clinical trial KCT0009296, registered at cris.nih.go.kr.

Indexed as

EsomeprazoleGastroesophageal RefluxProton Pump InhibitorsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionTreatment OutcomeEsomeprazoleProton Pump InhibitorsGERDOn-demandPotassium-competitive acid blockersTegoprazan

Identifiers

PMID39748010
PMCPMC11697203

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.